Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Serotype with Risk of Death Due to Pneumococcal Pneumonia: A Meta‐Analysis

Open access
Weinberger, Daniel M., Harboe, Zitta B., Sanders, Elisabeth A. M., Ndiritu, Moses, Klugman, Keith P., Rückinger, Simon, Dagan, Ron, Adegbola, Richard, Cutts, Felicity, Johnson, Hope L., O’Brien, Katherine L., Anthony Scott, J., Lipsitch, Marc·2010·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 92 capsular serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae differ greatly in nasopharyngeal carriage prevalence, invasiveness, and disease incidence. There has been some debate, though, regarding whether serotype independently affects the outcome of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). Published studies have shown variable results with regard to case-fatality ratios for specific serotypes and the role of host factors in affecting these relationships. We evaluated whether risk of death due to IPD is a stable serotype-associated property across studies and then compared the pooled effect estimates with epidemiologic and biological correlates. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of serotype-specific disease outcomes for patients with pneumonia and meningitis. Study-specific estimates of risk of death (risk ratio [RR]) were pooled from 9 studies that provided serotype-specific data on pneumonia and meningitis using a random-effects method with serotype 14 as the reference. Pooled RRs were compared with RRs from adults with low comorbidity scores to evaluate potential confounding by host factors. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the RR estimates among serotypes in patients with bacteremic pneumonia. Overall, serotypes 1, 7F, and 8 were associated with decreased RRs, and serotypes 3, 6A, 6B, 9N, and 19F were associated with increased RRs. Outcomes among meningitis patients did not differ significantly among serotypes. Serotypes with increased RRs had a high carriage prevalence, had low invasiveness, and were more heavily encapsulated in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IPD outcome, like other epidemiologic measures, is a stable serotype-associated property.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/655828

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Weinberger, D. M., Harboe, Z. B., Sanders, E. A. M., Ndiritu, M., Klugman, K. P., Rückinger, S., Dagan, R., Adegbola, R., Cutts, F., Johnson, H. L., O’Brien, K. L., Anthony Scott, J., & Lipsitch, M.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2010-09-15
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
692-699
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2148619574
Cited by
343
References
2
FWCI
21.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Serotype with Risk of Death Due to Pneumococcal Pneumonia: A Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/655828
The paper
Weinberger, D. M., Harboe, Z. B., Sanders, E. A. M., Ndiritu, M., Klugman, K. P., Rückinger, S., Dagan, R., Adegbola, R., Cutts, F., Johnson, H. L., O’Brien, K. L., Anthony Scott, J., & Lipsitch, M. (2010). Association of Serotype with Risk of Death Due to Pneumococcal Pneumonia: A Meta‐Analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/655828

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.