The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DiFX-2: A More Flexible, Efficient, Robust, and Powerful Software Correlator
Open accessAbstract
Software correlation, where a correlation algorithm written in a high-level language such as C++ is run on commodity computer hardware, has become increasingly attractive for small- to medium-sized and/or bandwidth-constrained radio interferometers. In particular, many long-baseline arrays (which typically have fewer than 20 elements and are restricted in observing bandwidth by costly recording hardware and media) have utilized software correlators for rapid, cost-effective, correlator upgrades to allow compatibility with new, wider-bandwidth, recording systems and to improve correlator flexibility. The DiFX correlator, made publicly available in 2007, has been a popular choice in such upgrades and is now used for production correlation by a number of observatories and research groups worldwide. Here, we describe the evolution in the capabilities of the DiFX correlator over the past three years, including a number of new capabilities, substantial performance improvements, and a large amount of supporting infrastructure to ease use of the code. New capabilities include the ability to correlate a large number of phase centers in a single correlation pass, the extraction of phase-calibration tones, correlation of disparate but overlapping sub-bands, the production of rapidly sampled filter-bank and kurtosis data at minimal cost, and many more. The latest version of the code is at least 15% faster than the original (and in certain situations, many times this value). Finally, we also present detailed test results validating the correctness of the new code.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., Algaba, J. C., Anantua, R., Asada, K., Azulay, R., Bach, U., Baczko, A.-K., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6736 · Cited by 369
“ALMA recorded using linear feeds, and the data were later converted to a circular polarization basis during the DiFX (Deller et al. 2011) correlation (Martí-Vidal et al. 2016; Matthews et al. 2018; Goddi et al. 2019).”
MethodSelf-citationWalker, R. C., Hardee, P. E., Davies, F. B., Ly, C., & Junor, W. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaafcc · Cited by 348
A VLBI experiment using a remote atomic clock via a coherent fibre link
Clivati, C., Ambrosini, R., Artz, T., Bertarini, A., Bortolotti, C., Frittelli, M., Levi, F., Mura, A., Maccaferri, G., Nanni, M., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep40992 · Cited by 123
The Scattering and Intrinsic Structure of Sagittarius A* at Radio Wavelengths
Johnson, M. D., Narayan, R., Psaltis, D., Blackburn, L., Kovalev, Y. Y., Gwinn, C. R., Zhao, G.-Y., Bower, G. C., Moran, J. M., Kino, M., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadcff · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Deller, A. T., Brisken, W. F., Phillips, C. J., Morgan, J., Alef, W., Cappallo, R., Middelberg, E., Romney, J., Rottmann, H., Tingay, S. J., & Wayth, R.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 901
- Pages
- 275-287
- ISSN
- 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3873
- OpenAlex
- W2001955524
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DiFX-2: A More Flexible, Efficient, Robust, and Powerful Software Correlator. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/658907
- The paper
- Deller, A. T., Brisken, W. F., Phillips, C. J., Morgan, J., Alef, W., Cappallo, R., Middelberg, E., Romney, J., Rottmann, H., Tingay, S. J., & Wayth, R. (2011). DiFX-2: A More Flexible, Efficient, Robust, and Powerful Software Correlator. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/658907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.