Cited by 105Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology

The Scattering and Intrinsic Structure of Sagittarius A* at Radio Wavelengths

Open access
Johnson, Michael D., Narayan, Ramesh, Psaltis, Dimitrios, Blackburn, Lindy, Kovalev, Yuri Y., Gwinn, Carl R., Zhao, Guang-Yao, Bower, Geoffrey C. +7 more·2018·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Radio images of the Galactic Center supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), are dominated by interstellar scattering. Previous studies of Sgr A* have adopted an anisotropic Gaussian model for both the intrinsic source and the scattering, and they have extrapolated the scattering using a purely λ 2 scaling to estimate intrinsic properties. However, physically motivated source and scattering models break all three of these assumptions. They also predict that refractive scattering effects will be significant, which have been ignored in standard model fitting procedures. We analyze radio observations of Sgr A* using a physically motivated scattering model, and we develop a prescription to incorporate refractive scattering uncertainties when model fitting. We show that an anisotropic Gaussian scattering kernel is an excellent approximation for Sgr A* at wavelengths longer than 1 cm, with an angular size of along the major axis, along the minor axis, and a position angle of . We estimate that the turbulent dissipation scale is at least 600 km, with tentative support for r in = 800 ± 200 km, suggesting that the ion Larmor radius defines the dissipation scale. We find that the power-law index for density fluctuations in the scattering material is β < 3.47, shallower than expected for a Kolmogorov spectrum ( β = 11/3), and we estimate in the case of r in = 800 km. We find that the intrinsic structure of Sgr A* is nearly isotropic over wavelengths from 1.3 mm to 1.3 cm, with a size that is roughly proportional to wavelength: . We discuss implications for models of Sgr A*, for theories of interstellar turbulence, and for imaging Sgr A* with the Event Horizon Telescope.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/aadcff

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. L. O. Sjouwerman, C. C. Lang, & J. Ott (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 288
  2. Psaltis, D., Johnson, M., Narayan, R., et al. 2018, ApJ, submitted (arXiv:1805. 01242)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, M. D., Narayan, R., Psaltis, D., Blackburn, L., Kovalev, Y. Y., Gwinn, C. R., Zhao, G.-Y., Bower, G. C., Moran, J. M., Kino, M., Kramer, M., Akiyama, K., Dexter, J., Broderick, A. E., & Sironi, L.
Affiliations
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KR)
  • Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica (TW)
  • Kogakuin University (JP)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Michael D.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2018-09-27
Volume
865
Issue
2
Pages
104
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2889248467
Cited by
105
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1440254, 1312651, 1716536)
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF5278, AST-1440254)
  • Harvard University
  • Swinburne University of Technology
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/P000649/1)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K03656)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Keywords
Sgr A*, Galactic center supermassive black hole, radio wave scattering, refractive scattering, interstellar turbulence, density fluctuations, ion Larmor radius, wavelength scaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review