The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Your DNA Is Our History”: Genomics, Anthropology, and the Construction of Whiteness as Property
Abstract
During the nineteenth century, the American School of Anthropology enfolded Native peoples into their histories, claiming knowledge about and artifacts of these cultures as their rightful inheritance and property. Drawing both on the Genographic Project and the recent struggles between Arizona State University and the Havasupai Tribe over the use of Havasupai DNA, in this essay we describe how similar enfoldments continue today—despite most contemporary human scientists’ explicit rejection of hierarchical ideas of race. We seek to bring greater clarity and visibility to these constitutive links between whiteness, property, and the human sciences in order that the fields of biological anthropology and population genetics might work to move toward their stated commitments to antiracism (a goal, we argue, that the fields’ antiracialism impedes). Specifically, we reflect on how these links can inform extralegal strategies to address tensions between U.S. and other indigenous peoples and genome scientists and their facilitators (ethicists, lawyers, and policy makers). We conclude by suggesting changes to scientific education and professional standards that might improve relations between indigenous peoples and those who study them, and we introduce mechanisms for networking between indigenous peoples, scholars, and policy makers concerned with expanding indigenous governance of science and technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harris, C. I. (1993) · Harvard Law Review · doi:10.2307/1341787 · Cited by 5,300
The American Journal of Human Genetics
S., J. (1950) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1523704 · Cited by 5,028
Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution
Dobzhansky, T. (1973) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.2307/4444260 · Cited by 3,219
The History and Geography of Human Genes: Abridged paperback Edition
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P., & Piazza, A. (2018) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv301gjp · Cited by 3,175
The possessive investment in whiteness: how white people profit from identity politics
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-2457 · Cited by 2,402
Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States
Jasanoff, S. (2005) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400837311 · Cited by 2,338
History and Geography of Human Genes
Piazza, A. (1994) · Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-78782-9_1 · Cited by 1,639
Genomewide Association Studies and Assessment of the Risk of Disease
Manolio, T. A. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0905980 · Cited by 1,512
Racist culture: philosophy and the politics of meaning
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-5738 · Cited by 1,495
TallBear, K. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9780816685776 · Cited by 1,113
Self-citation
Cited by
Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016) · Mind, Culture, and Activity · doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572 · Cited by 239
Lanzarotta, T. (2020) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312720943678 · Cited by 28
Thiaw, I., & Mack, D. L. (2020) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/709830 · Cited by 17
Arakawa, F., & Berryman, S. (2026) · Museum Anthropology · doi:10.1111/muan.70025 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Reardon, J., & TallBear, K.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- S5
- Pages
- S233-S245
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W1517172322
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Your DNA Is Our History”: Genomics, Anthropology, and the Construction of Whiteness as Property. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/662629
- The paper
- Reardon, J., & TallBear, K. (2012). “Your DNA Is Our History”: Genomics, Anthropology, and the Construction of Whiteness as Property. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/662629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.