Cited by 82Historical Economic and Social StudiesDiverse Historical and Scientific StudiesEcocriticism and Environmental Literature

The Industrial Revolution in the Anthropocene

Albritton Jonsson, Fredrik·2012·The Journal of Modern History

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/666049

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albritton Jonsson, F.
Venue
The Journal of Modern History
Published
2012-09
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
679-696
ISSN
  • 0022-2801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5358
OpenAlex
W1991011839
Cited by
82
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Modern History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Keywords
Industrial Revolution, Anthropocene, industrialization, environmental history, human-environment relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review