Cited by 256Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Nudging Energy Efficiency Behavior: The Role of Information Labels

Newell, Richard G., Siikamäki, Juha·2014·Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

Abstract

We use choice experiments and randomized information treatments to study the effectiveness of alternative energy efficiency labels in guiding households’ energy efficiency decisions. We disentangle the relative importance of different types of information and distinguish it from intertemporal behavior. We find that insufficient information can lead to considerable undervaluation of energy efficiency. Simple information on the monetary value of energy savings was the most important element guiding cost-efficient energy efficiency investments, with information on physical energy use and carbon dioxide emissions having additional but lesser importance. The degree to which the current US EnergyGuide label guided cost-efficient decisions depends on the discount rate. Using elicited individual discount rates, the current EnergyGuide label came very close to guiding cost-efficient decisions. Using a uniform 5% discount rate, the current label led to one-third undervaluation of energy efficiency. Our results reinforce the centrality of discounting in understanding individual behavior and guiding policy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/679281

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Informational labels and awareness campaigns have been shown to be effective drivers of eco-friendly behaviors, depending on the context.

    “Awareness: Informational labels and awareness campaigns have been shown to be effective drivers of eco-friendly behaviors (depending on the context) (Banerjee and Solomon, 2003; Sundar et al., 2018; Newell and Siikamäki, 2014; Byerly et al., 2018).”

    From Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning (2020) · cites this paper as Newell and Siikamäki, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newell, R. G., & Siikamäki, J.
Venue
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Published
2014-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
555-598
ISSN
  • 2333-5955 (ISSN-L)
  • 2333-5963
OpenAlex
W3022555407
Cited by
256
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
energy efficiency, nudging, discounting, discount rate, energy efficiency investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review