The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating Distances from Parallaxes
Open accessAbstract
Astrometric surveys such as Gaia and LSST will measure parallaxes for hundreds of millions of stars. Yet they will not measure a single distance. Rather, a distance must be estimated from a parallax. In this didactic article, I show that doing this is not trivial once the fractional parallax error is larger than about 20%, which will be the case for about 80% of stars in the Gaia catalog. Estimating distances is an inference problem in which the use of prior assumptions is unavoidable. I investigate the properties and performance of various priors and examine their implications. A supposed uninformative uniform prior in distance is shown to give very poor distance estimates (large bias and variance). Any prior with a sharp cut-off at some distance has similar problems. The choice of prior depends on the information one has available—and is willing to use—concerning, e.g., the survey and the Galaxy. I demonstrate that a simple prior which decreases asymptotically to zero at infinite distance has good performance, accommodates nonpositive parallaxes, and does not require a bias correction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimating Distance from Parallaxes. IV. Distances to 1.33 Billion Stars in Gaia Data Release 2
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Mantelet, G., & Andrae, R. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 · Cited by 1,829
Self-citationTrigonometric Parallaxes of High-mass Star-forming Regions: Our View of the Milky Way
Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., Zheng, X. W., Dame, T. M., Xu, Y., Li, J., Sakai, N., Wu, Y., Immer, K., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11 · Cited by 760
Accurate Empirical Radii and Masses of Planets and Their Host Stars with Gaia Parallaxes
Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., & Gaudi, B. S. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa5df3 · Cited by 459
The kinematics of the Scorpius-Centaurus OB association from Gaia DR1
Wright, N. J., & Mamajek, E. E. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty207 · Cited by 144
Tracing the formation of the Milky Way through ultra metal-poor stars
Sestito, F., Longeard, N., Martin, N. F., Starkenburg, E., Fouesneau, M., González Hernández, J. I., Arentsen, A., Ibata, R., Aguado, D. S., Carlberg, R. G., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz043 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 956
- Pages
- 994-1009
- ISSN
- 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3873
- OpenAlex
- W1658330429
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/683116
- The paper
- Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. (2015). Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/683116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.