PreprintCited by 4Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthEfficiency Analysis Using DEA

Technological Progress and Climate Change: Evidence from the Agricultural Sector

Open access
Da Mata, Daniel, Dotta, Mario, Lobo, Thiago·2023·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

We investigate whether technological progress can decouple output growth from greenhouse gas emissions. Using a dynamic difference-indifferences design, we show that producers in Brazilian localities with high suitability for genetically modified seeds increase crop output by substituting away from higher-emission activities (such as cattle-raising). This increased crop output is not accompanied by deforestation and fires-two major emitters. Our findings show decoupling in the agriculture sector, with lower emissions per output. The effects are not limited to agriculture; manufacturingrelated emissions are affected and increase. Technological innovations can affect emissions of the targeted sector and have meaningful spillovers to other economic sectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4358828

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The absence of long-term biodiversity records for taxonomic groups heavily impacted by pesticides, such as insects and microbes, hinders a full understanding of GM crop management's effects on biodiversity.

    “The absence of long-term biodiversity records for taxonomic groups heavily impacted by pesticides, such as insects and microbes, hinders a full understanding of GMcrop management's effects on biodiversity ( 121 -124 )”

    From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [124]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Da Mata, D., Dotta, M., & Lobo, T.
Affiliations
  • Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (BR)
  • Escola de Economia de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321033401
Cited by
4
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Keywords
technological progress, climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, genetically modified seeds, agricultural sector, cattle farming, deforestation, forest fires, manufacturing emissions, spillover effects, Brazilian agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review