The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Payment Mechanisms and Antipoverty Programs: Evidence from a Mobile Money Cash Transfer Experiment in Niger
Abstract
Cash transfers have become an increasingly important component of social protection policies in both developed and developing countries. While such programs are often implemented electronically in developed countries, in many developing countries with weak financial infrastructure, such transfers are distributed manually, resulting in significant costs to program recipients and the public sector alike. The introduction of mobile money systems in many developing countries offers new opportunities for distributing cash transfers. Using data from a randomized experiment of a mobile money cash transfer program in Niger, we find evidence of benefits of this new system: household diet diversity was 9%–16% higher among households who received mobile transfers, and children ate an additional one-third of a meal per day. These results can be partially attributed to time savings associated with mobile transfers, as program recipients spent less time traveling to and waiting for their transfer. They are also associated with shifts in intrahousehold bargaining power for women. These results suggest that electronic transfers may address key logistical challenges in implementing cash transfer programs in developing countries but that sufficient investment in the payments infrastructure is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, M. L. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214508000000841 · Cited by 2,410
Beyond baseline and follow-up: The case for more T in experiments
McKenzie, D. (2012) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.01.002 · Cited by 871
Hatløy, A., Hallund, J., Diarra, M. M., & Oshaug, A. (2000) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980000000628 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Impact of digital surge during COVID-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice
De’, R., Pandey, N., & Pal, A. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171 · Cited by 1,110
Does financial literacy improve financial inclusion? Cross country evidence
Grohmann, A., Klühs, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.020 · Cited by 699
Experimental evidence on learning using low-tech when school is out
Angrist, N., Bergman, P., & Matsheng, M. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01381-z · Cited by 105
Pal, J., Chandra, P., Kameswaran, V., Parameshwar, A., Joshi, S., & Johri, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173803 · Cited by 61
The Agricultural Impacts of Armed Conflicts: The Case of Fulani Militia
George, J., Adelaja, A., & Awokuse, T. O. (2021) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbaa022 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Aker, J. C., Boumnijel, R., McClelland, A., & Tierney, N.
- Venue
- Economic Development and Cultural Change
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 0013-0079 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-2988
- OpenAlex
- W2514542987
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 57.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Payment Mechanisms and Antipoverty Programs: Evidence from a Mobile Money Cash Transfer Experiment in Niger. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/687578
- The paper
- Aker, J. C., Boumnijel, R., McClelland, A., & Tierney, N. (2016). Payment Mechanisms and Antipoverty Programs: Evidence from a Mobile Money Cash Transfer Experiment in Niger. Economic Development and Cultural Change. https://doi.org/10.1086/687578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.