Cited by 172Race, Genetics, and SocietyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCultural Identity and Representation

Genetic Options: The Impact of Genetic Ancestry Testing on Consumers’ Racial and Ethnic Identities

Roth, Wendy D., Ivemark, Biorn·2018·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

The rapid growth of genetic ancestry testing has brought concerns that these tests will transform consumers’ racial and ethnic identities, producing “geneticized” identities determined by genetic knowledge. Drawing on 100 qualitative interviews with white, black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, and Native Americans, the authors develop the genetic options theory to account for how genetic ancestry tests influence consumers’ ethnic and racial identities. The theory maintains that consumers do not accept the tests’ results as given but choose selectively from the estimates according to two mechanisms: their identity aspirations and social appraisals. Yet consumers’ prior racialization also influences their identity aspirations; white respondents aspired to new identities more readily and in substantively different ways. The authors’ findings suggest that genetic ancestry testing can reinforce race privilege among those who already experience it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/697487

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even as genomics researchers warn not to interpret genetic ancestry as race or ethnicity, this has not prevented people from interpreting them as such.

    “Even as genomics researchers warn not to interpret genetic ancestry as race or ethnicity [15, 122], this has not prevented people (e.g. customers of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies) from interpreting them as such [98].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roth, W. D., & Ivemark, B.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
2018-07
Volume
124
Issue
1
Pages
150-184
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W2811313855
Cited by
172
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
Keywords
genetic ancestry testing, racial identity, ethnic identity, social evaluation, white identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review