Cited by 74Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Ancestry, Color, or Culture? How Whites Racially Classify Others in the U.S.

Schachter, Ariela, Flores, René D., Maghbouleh, Neda·2021·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

Historically, the U.S. legal system formally institutionalized ancestry and appearance as the foundations of racial membership. Yet evidence suggests informal classification logics based on cultural cues like religion or language may have also long been present. Using a conjoint survey experiment, we disentangle the underlying classification logics of White observers and uncover three key norms: (1) ancestry strongly shapes classification, but there is little evidence of strict hypodescent; (2) skin color is a powerful signal that overrides ancestry when these signals conflict; and (3) sociocultural cues are especially important for “racial middle” categories such as Hispanic, Native American, MENA, and Asian. Our findings show that formal and informal racial classification logics can coexist in time and place. Further, the balance of these competing logics may depend on how state and nonstate actors establish and reinforce membership criteria. Our results hold methodological implications for studies that seek to operationalize race.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/714215

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Racial identification as white is an ideational and claims-making tool which, in the West, provides access to belonging among newcomers of European origins while putting the onus of proving belonging on non-whites.

    “To bring the paper's case study to the broader debates in ethnic, migration and refugee studies, it is worth noting that recent research shows that racial identification as white is an ideational and claims-making tool which, in the West, provides access to belonging among newcomers of European origins (Nancheva and Ranta 2022;Schachter, Flores, and Maghbouleh 2021) while putting the onus of”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schachter, A., Flores, R. D., & Maghbouleh, N.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
126
Issue
5
Pages
1220-1263
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W3163390736
Cited by
74
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
FWCI
15.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
racial classification, ancestry, skin color, cultural cues, language, hypodescent, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, Middle East and North Africa, Asians, conjoint survey experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review