Cited by 3,356Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells

Open access
Klein, Allon M., Mazutis, Linas, Akartuna, Ilke, Tallapragada, Naren, Veres, Adrian, Li, Victor, Peshkin, Leonid, Weitz, David A. +1 more·2015·Cell

Abstract

It has long been the dream of biologists to map gene expression at the single-cell level. With such data one might track heterogeneous cell sub-populations, and infer regulatory relationships between genes and pathways. Recently, RNA sequencing has achieved single-cell resolution. What is limiting is an effective way to routinely isolate and process large numbers of individual cells for quantitative in-depth sequencing. We have developed a high-throughput droplet-microfluidic approach for barcoding the RNA from thousands of individual cells for subsequent analysis by next-generation sequencing. The method shows a surprisingly low noise profile and is readily adaptable to other sequencing-based assays. We analyzed mouse embryonic stem cells, revealing in detail the population structure and the heterogeneous onset of differentiation after leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) withdrawal. The reproducibility of these high-throughput single-cell data allowed us to deconstruct cell populations and infer gene expression relationships. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The C1 system allows direct confirmation of single cell capture events.

    “Notably, in the context of this study, the C1 system also allows for direct confirmation of single cell capture events, in contrast to most other microfluidic-based approaches322.”
  • The scale and precision of single-cell studies has continued to increase, reaching tens of thousands of cells for massively parallel scRNA-seq and millions of cells for mass cytometry protein measurements.

    “The scale and precision of such studies has continued to increase, reaching tens of thousands of cells for massively parallel scRNA-seq30,31 and millions of cells for mass cytometry signature protein measurements32–34.”
  • Using the latest protocols for massively parallel scRNA-seq and mass cytometry, a single laboratory can now readily collect tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of single-cell RNA-seq profiles and tens of millions of single-cell protein profiles.

    “Using the latest protocols for massively parallel scRNA-seq30,31 and mass cytometry32–34, a single laboratory can now readily collect tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of single-cell RNA-seq profiles and tens of millions of single-cell protein profiles.”
  • Massively parallel scRNA-seq methods such as Drop-seq can be applied at scale cost-effectively but require intact single-cell suspensions.

    “massively parallel scRNA-seq methods, such as Drop-seq7 and related methods8–10 can be readily applied at scale11 in a cost-effective manner12, but require intact single cell suspension as input.”

    From Massively parallel single-nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq (2017) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Droplet and well-based single-cell RNA-sequencing technologies can isolate and barcode cell transcriptomes at high throughput and relatively low cost.

    “Droplet microfluidic (Klein et al., 2015; Macosko et al., 2015; Zheng et al., 2017) and well-based (Cao et al., 2017; Gierahn et al., 2017; Han et al., 2018; Rosenberg et al., 2018) technologies now enable the relatively inexpensive, high-throughput isolation and barcoding of cell transcriptomes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, A. M., Mazutis, L., Akartuna, I., Tallapragada, N., Veres, A., Li, V., Peshkin, L., Weitz, D. A., & Kirschner, M. W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Weitz, David A.
  • Kirschner, Marc W.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
161
Issue
5
Pages
1187-1201
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135937351
Cited by
3,356
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 170 · 2025: 238 · 2024: 316 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 355 · 2021: 420 · 2020: 404 · 2019: 343 · 2018: 335 · 2017: 237 · 2016: 169 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
114.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1310266, 1420570)
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (DMR-1420570, HD073104)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011‐11‐C‐0093, HR0011)
  • Harvard Stem Cell Institute
  • Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard University (DMR- 1420570, 1420570, DMR-1310266)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL120839)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM096971, R01GM026875, R01GM103785)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI101291)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21DK098818)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB014703)
  • Division of Materials Research (DMR 14–20570, DMR-1310266, 1420570, 1310266)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD073104)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell transcriptomics, microfluidics, mouse embryonic stem cells, stochastic gene expression, cell isolation
MeSH terms
Animals, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review