Cited by 7,110Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.

Open access
Macosko, Evan Z., Basu, Anindita, Satija, Rahul, Nemesh, James, Shekhar, Karthik, Goldman, Melissa, Tirosh, Itay, Bialas, Allison R. +8 more·2015·Cell

Abstract

Summary Cells, the basic units of biological structure and function, vary broadly in type and state. Single-cell genomics can characterize cell identity and function, but limitations of ease and scale have prevented its broad application. Here we describe Drop-Seq, a strategy for quickly profiling thousands of individual cells by separating them into nanoliter-sized aqueous droplets, associating a different barcode with each cell’s RNAs, and sequencing them all together. Drop-Seq analyzes mRNA transcripts from thousands of individual cells simultaneously while remembering transcripts’ cell of origin. We analyzed transcriptomes from 44,808 mouse retinal cells and identified 39 transcriptionally distinct cell populations, creating a molecular atlas of gene expression for known retinal cell classes and novel candidate cell subtypes. Drop-Seq will accelerate biological discovery by enabling routine transcriptional profiling at single-cell resolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-throughput perturbation screens based on RNA-seq, optical pooled screens (OPS), or other technologies offer a rich resource through which the AIVC can be trained to predict perturbation effects.

    “Here, high-throughput perturbation screens—based on RNA-seq,28,83,90 optical pooled screens (OPS),29,39,91 or other technologies—offer a rich resource through which the AIVC can be trained to predict these effects.”

    From How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Results describe Drop-Seq as a high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq method, and the Discussion proposes that coupling it to perturbations could yield information-rich readouts. The paper does not report a perturbation screen; it presents that application as a possibility. The optical-screen citations and the citing authors’ proposed AIVC use are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An alternative way to break droplets in the Drop-seq protocol recovered beads much more efficiently than the original Drop-seq publication.

    “Our most important modification to the Drop-seq protocol was an alternative way to break droplets, which recovered beads much more efficiently than in the original publication of Drop-seq 7 .”

    From Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Experimental Procedures (‘Drop-Seq procedure’; page not provided) describe the original method of breaking droplets with perfluorooctanol and then washing the beads. The paper does not evaluate the citing authors’ alternative method or compare bead-recovery efficiency, so it supports the identification of the original protocol but not the claimed improvement. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The top 50 principal components explained more than 90% of single-cell variance.

    “Because the top 50 PCs explained more than 90% of single-cell variance (Supplementary Figure S4), we chose them to cluster 175 MEFs by Seurat package (Macosko et al., 2015).”
  • Simultaneously demultiplexing and detecting doublets from more than two individuals has not been possible.

    “While strategies to demultiplex cells from different species1, 10, 17 or host and graft samples17 have been reported, simultaneously demultiplexing and detecting doublets from more than two individuals has not been possible.”
  • Droplet single-cell RNA sequencing has made it possible to profile transcriptomes rapidly and at large scale.

    “Droplet single cell RNA-sequencing (dscRNA-seq) has increased substantially the throughput of single cell capture and library preparation1, 10, enabling the simultaneous profiling of thousands of cells.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., Trombetta, J. J., Weitz, D. A., Sanes, J. R., Shalek, A. K., Regev, A., & McCarroll, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Macosko, Evan Z.
  • McCarroll, Steven A.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
161
Issue
5
Pages
1202-1214
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102212449
Cited by
7,110
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 445 · 2025: 567 · 2024: 698 · 2023: 761 · 2022: 789 · 2021: 902 · 2020: 854 · 2019: 710 · 2018: 642 · 2017: 413 · 2016: 245 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
198.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (ECS- 03-35765, 1310266, 0335765, 1420570)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Alexander and Margaret Stewart Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (ECS-0335765, DMR-1420570)
  • Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard University (DMR- 1420570, 1420570, DMR-1310266)
  • Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute
  • Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute
  • Simons Center for the Social Brain, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R25MH094612, U01MH105960)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (P50HG006193, HG006193)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI074549)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK043351)
  • Division of Materials Research (DMR 14–20570, DMR-1310266, 1420570, 1310266)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD075541)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Drop-seq, single-cell transcriptomics, nanoliter droplets, cell barcoding, mRNA sequencing, retinal cell types, retinal transcriptome, cell subtypes, molecular atlas, mouse retina
MeSH terms
Animals, Retina, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Mice, Genome-Wide Association Study, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review