A Synchronized Early Middle Bronze Age Chronology for Egypt, the Levant, and Mesopotamia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The independent dating framework aligns best with the High-Middle Chronology (hMC) or Low-Middle Chronology (lMC).
“This aligns best with the High-Middle Chronology (hMC) or Low-Middle Chronology (lMC) (see Roaf 2012;de Jong 2012de Jong -2013de Jong , 2016de Jong -2017;;Höflmayer & Manning 2022)”
From New evidence for Middle Bronze Age chronology from the Syro-Anatolian frontier (2023) · cites this paper as Höflmayer & Manning 2022
Revision of the Tell el-Dabʿa chronology raises the end of the Middle Bronze Age in the Eastern Mediterranean to c. 1600 BC.
“Meanwhile, revision of the Tell el-Dabʿa chronology, reconciling its radiocarbon dates and archaeo-historical chronology with new radiocarbon dates from sites in the Central and Southern Levant, raises the end of the Middle Bronze Age in the Eastern Mediterranean to c. 1600 BC (Höflmayer et al. 2016a(Höflmayer et al. , 2016b;;Höflmayer 2019;Höflmayer & Manning 2022;pace Bietak 2021).”
From New evidence for Middle Bronze Age chronology from the Syro-Anatolian frontier (2023) · cites this paper as Höflmayer & Manning 2022
Following the Eastern Mediterranean low chronology, this would be c.1710-1650 BC, while modelling of radiocarbon dates at Tell el-Dabʿa indicates ages a century earlier, between 1872-1752 and 1813-1710 BC, at 95.4% probability.
“Following the Eastern Mediterranean low chronology advocated by Hazor's excavator, this would be c.1710-1650 BC, while modelling of radiocarbon dates at Tell el-Dabʿa indicates ages a century earlier, between 1872-1752 (G/1-3 to F Boundary) and 1813-1710 BC (E/3 to E/2 Boundary), at 95.4 per cent probability (following revision of Kutschera et al. 2012by Höflmayer & Manning 2022).”
From New evidence for Middle Bronze Age chronology from the Syro-Anatolian frontier (2023) · cites this paper as Höflmayer & Manning 2022
These strata had been dated to c. 1530-1470 BC in the historical chronology, whereas modelled radiocarbon dates place them at 1679-1595 and 1635-1546 BC at 95.4% probability.
“These strata had been dated to c. 1530-1470 BC (early Eighteenth Dynasty) in the historical chronology (Kutschera et al. 2012: fig.3), whereas modelled radiocarbon dates place them at 1679-1595 (Strata D/2 to D/1 Boundary) and 1635-1546 BC (start Stratum C/2 Boundary) at 95.4 per cent probability (following revision of Kutschera et al. 2012by Höflmayer & Manning 2022).”
From New evidence for Middle Bronze Age chronology from the Syro-Anatolian frontier (2023) · cites this paper as Höflmayer & Manning 2022
The Old Kingdom and Middle Kingdom periods provide the key pillar for placing and linking the chronology of the Early and Middle Bronze Ages in the ancient Near East and Eastern Mediterranean.
“Specifically, the Old Kingdom (OK, c. mid-late 3rd millennium BCE, the ‘Pyramid Age’) and Middle Kingdom (MK, c. late 3rd/early 2nd millennium BCE) periods provide the key pillar for placing and linking the chronology of the Early and Middle Bronze Ages in the ancient Near East and Eastern Mediterranean [4–8].”
From Resolution of the High versus Low debate for Old and Middle Kingdom Egypt (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
Dee et al. found an offset with a 14C depletion of 19 ± 5 y in Egypt due to a shift in the regional growing season (winter/spring) compared to that of the trees of higher latitudes used for assembling the calibration curve (spring/summer); it was later reduced to 12.5 y when comparing AMS measurements with segments in the calibration curve that were also measured by AMS.
“Dee et al. (18) found an offset with a 14C depletion of 19 ± 5 y in Egypt due to a shift in the regional growing season (winter/spring) compared to that of the trees of higher latitudes used for assembling the calibration curve (spring/summer). It was later reduced to 12.5 y when comparing AMS measurements with segments in the calibration curve that were also measured by AMS (64, 65).”
From Radiocarbon chronology of Iron Age Jerusalem reveals calibration offsets and architectural developments (2024) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Höflmayer, F., & Manning, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2022-04-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0022-2968 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6978
- OpenAlex
- W4226339944
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 20.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- Early-Middle Bronze Age, chronology, synchronization, Egyptian chronology, Levant, Mesopotamia, Bronze Age, absolute dating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review