Cited by 149Social Media in Health EducationHealth, Medicine and SocietyEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media

Shore, Rebecca, Halsey, Julia, Shah, Kavita, Crigger, Bette-Jane, Douglas, Sharon P.·2011·The Journal of Clinical Ethics

Abstract

Although many physicians have been using the internet for both clinical and social purposes for years, recently concerns have been raised regarding blurred boundaries of the profession as a whole. In both the news media and medical literature, physicians have noted there are unanswered questions in these areas, and that professional self-regulation is needed. This report discusses the ethical implications of physicians' nonclinical use of the internet, including the use of social networking sites, blogs, and other means to post content online. It does not address the clinical use of the internet, such as telemedicine, e-prescribing, online clinical consultations, health-related websites, use of electronic media for clinical collaboration, and e-mailing patients (some of which are already covered in the AMA's Code of Medical Ethics).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/jce201122208

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Code of Medial Ethics of the American Medical Association, 2010, 2010-2011 ed. (Chicago: American Medical Association
  2. Derse A.R., 2010, American Medical News
  3. News BBC, 2010, BBC News
  4. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2010, Code of Medial Ethics of the
  5. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2010, Code of Medical Ethics of the
  6. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2010, Code of Medical Ethics of the
  7. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2010, Code of Medical Ethics of the
  8. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2010, Code of Medical Ethics of the
  9. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2010, Code of Medical Ethics of the
  10. Affairs Judicial, 2010, Code of Medical Ethics of the
  11. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2010, Code of Medical Ethics of the
  12. Schwartz J., 2009, New York Times
  13. Wortham J., 2010, New York Times
  14. Coffield R.L., 2010, American Health Lawyers Association Connections, 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–148 of 148

Metadata

Authors
Shore, R., Halsey, J., Shah, K., Crigger, B.-J., & Douglas, S. P.
Affiliations
  • American Medical Association (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Ethics
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
165-172
ISSN
  • 1046-7890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5879
OpenAlex
W1539354747
Cited by
149
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
physician professionalism, social media, social networking sites, blogs, professional boundaries, medical ethics, professional self-regulation, physician-patient communication
MeSH terms
American Medical Association, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Social Environment, United States, Liability, Legal, Professional Autonomy, Privacy, Internet, Advisory Committees, Personal Autonomy, Ethical Analysis, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review