Cited by 149Social Media in Health EducationHealth, Medicine and SocietyEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media

Shore, Rebecca, Halsey, Julia, Shah, Kavita, Crigger, Bette-Jane, Douglas, Sharon P.·2011·The Journal of Clinical Ethics

Abstract

Although many physicians have been using the internet for both clinical and social purposes for years, recently concerns have been raised regarding blurred boundaries of the profession as a whole. In both the news media and medical literature, physicians have noted there are unanswered questions in these areas, and that professional self-regulation is needed. This report discusses the ethical implications of physicians' nonclinical use of the internet, including the use of social networking sites, blogs, and other means to post content online. It does not address the clinical use of the internet, such as telemedicine, e-prescribing, online clinical consultations, health-related websites, use of electronic media for clinical collaboration, and e-mailing patients (some of which are already covered in the AMA's Code of Medical Ethics).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/jce201122208

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guidelines prohibit some social media behaviors, such as falsifying credentials.

    “While guidelines prohibit some SM behaviors, such as falsifying credentials”
  • Regulatory agencies have issued guidelines to aid providers in appropriate social media use.

    “In response to episodes of unprofessional behavior, regulatory agencies have issued guidelines to aid providers in appropriate SM use. 8,9”
  • Guidelines for social media use are available from numerous professional societies, and a recent review about available guidelines from nine medical international bodies has been published.

    “Guidelines are also available from numerous professional societies [171-178], and a recent review about available guidelines from nine medical international bodies has been published [179].”
  • The academic literature on social media in medicine is dominated by warnings about dangers and misuse rather than by consideration of positive applications.

    “Rather than focusing on the promise of these emerging tools, the academic literature is replete with admonishments of how social media pose a danger to medical professionals, and guidelines regarding social media are written with expectations of misuse rather than consideration of positive application.”
  • The American Medical Association's 2010 guidelines on professionalism and social media emphasize cautionary advice and expectations of misuse rather than positive applications.

    “Guidelines for professionalism and the use of social media developed by the American Medical Association in 2010 10 -which offer cautionary advice on posting identifiable information online, safeguarding sensitive online content using”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shore, R., Halsey, J., Shah, K., Crigger, B.-J., & Douglas, S. P.
Affiliations
  • American Medical Association (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Ethics
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
165-172
ISSN
  • 1046-7890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5879
OpenAlex
W1539354747
Cited by
149
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
physician professionalism, social media, social networking sites, blogs, professional boundaries, medical ethics, professional self-regulation, physician-patient communication
MeSH terms
American Medical Association, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Social Environment, United States, Liability, Legal, Professional Autonomy, Privacy, Internet, Advisory Committees, Personal Autonomy, Ethical Analysis, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review