Cited by 130Library Science and InformationPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Institutional repositories and scholarly publishing

Ware, Mark·2004·Learned Publishing

Abstract

The institutional repository (IR), an open Web‐based archive of scholarly material produced by the members of a defined institution, has come to the fore following the launch of DSpace at MIT at the end of 2002. Here we review recent developments in IRs and explore the impact their expansion may have on scholarly publishing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1087/095315104322958490

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ware, M.
Corresponding author
Ware, Mark
Venue
Learned Publishing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
115-124
ISSN
  • 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-4857
OpenAlex
W2009958682
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
66.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learned Publishing (publishedVersion)
Funders
PALS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
institutional repositories, scholarly publishing, DSpace, open access, digital archives, scholarly communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review