Cited by 22Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Satellite Systems and Control

OCCULTATION OBSERVATIONS OF SATURN'S B RING AND CASSINI DIVISION

Open access
French, Richard G., Marouf, Essam A., Rappaport, Nicole J., McGhee, Colleen A.·2010·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

The outer edge of Saturn's B ring is strongly affected by the nearby 2:1 inner Lindblad resonance of Mimas and is distorted approximately into a centered elliptical shape, which at the time of the Voyager 1 and 2 encounters was oriented with its periapse toward Mimas. Subsequent observations have shown that the actual situation is considerably more complex. We present a complete set of historical occultation measurements of the B-ring edge, including the 1980 Voyager 1 and 1981 Voyager 2 radio and stellar occultations, the 1989 occultation of 28 Sgr, two independently analyzed occultations observed with the Hubble Space Telescope in 1991 and 1995, and a series of ring profiles from 12 diametric (ansa-to-ansa) occultations observed in 2005, using the Cassini Radio Science Subsystem (RSS). After making an approximate correction for systematic errors in the reconstructed spacecraft trajectories, we obtain orbit fits to features in the rings with rms residuals well under 1 km, in most cases. Fits to the B-ring edge in the RSS data reveal a systematic variation in the maximum optical depth at the very edge of the ring as a function of its orbital radius. We compare the B-ring measurements to an m = 2 distortion aligned with Mimas, and show that there have been substantial phase shifts over the past 25 years. Finally, we present freely precessing equatorial elliptical models for 16 features in the Cassini Division. The inner edges of the gaps are generally eccentric, whereas the outer edges are nearly circular, with ae < 0.5 km.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-6256/139/4/1649

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The moon Mimas plays a role in causing some of the structure in the Cassini Division and apparent gap.

    “The moon does indeed play a role in causing some of the structure in the Cassini Division and apparent gap.”

    From Mean motion resonances with nearby moons: an unlikely origin for the gaps observed in the ring around the exoplanet J1407b (2019) · cites this paper as French et al 2010

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the B-ring edge, which borders the Cassini Division, lies near Mimas’s 2:1 resonance and describes evidence for a resonant interaction. But Section 6 (page unavailable) attributes the pattern of gaps within the Division to forcing by the B ring; it does not establish that Mimas causes that internal structure or the apparent gap. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Much of the finer scale structure in the Cassini Division is still not understood and has no apparent association with perturbing satellites.

    “However, much of the finer scale structure is still not understood and has no apparent association with perturbing satellites (French et al 2010; Hedman et al 2010; French et al 2016).”

    From Mean motion resonances with nearby moons: an unlikely origin for the gaps observed in the ring around the exoplanet J1407b (2019) · cites this paper as French et al 2010

    The discussion of fine-scale structure (page not supplied) reports that much of the inner Cassini Division lacks the wake-like features expected from nearby moonlets. Section 6 also describes unresolved dynamical influences, but it identifies a possible perturbation from a Prometheus resonance and reports a proposed B-ring explanation for the gap pattern. Thus the source supports the claim’s general thrust, not an unqualified lack of satellite associations or understanding. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bosh, A. S. 1994, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
French, R. G., Marouf, E. A., Rappaport, N. J., & McGhee, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Wellesley College (US)
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
French, Richard G.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2010-03-11
Volume
139
Issue
4
Pages
1649-1667
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W1972735051
Cited by
22
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Wellesley College
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
Saturn B ring, Cassini Division, ring occultation, Mimas, ring optical depth, Voyager 1, Voyager 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review