The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NUMERICAL TESTS OF FAST RECONNECTION IN WEAKLY STOCHASTIC MAGNETIC FIELDS
Open accessAbstract
We study the effects of turbulence on magnetic reconnection using three-dimensional direct numerical simulations. This is the first attempt to test a model of fast magnetic reconnection in the presence of weak turbulence proposed by Lazarian & Vishniac. This model predicts that weak turbulence, which is generically present in most astrophysical systems, enhances the rate of reconnection by reducing the transverse scale for reconnection events and by allowing many independent flux reconnection events to occur simultaneously. As a result, the reconnection speed becomes independent of Ohmic resistivity and is determined by the magnetic field wandering induced by turbulence. We test the dependence of the reconnection speed on turbulent power, the energy injection scale, and resistivity. We apply the open and experiment with the outflow boundary conditions in our numerical model and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of various setups. To test our results, we also perform simulations of turbulence with the same outflow boundaries but without a large-scale field reversal, thus without large-scale reconnection. To quantify the reconnection speed we use both an intuitive definition, i.e., the speed of the reconnected flux inflow, and a more sophisticated definition based on a formally derived analytical expression. Our results confirm the predictions of the Lazarian and Vishniac model. In particular, we find that the reconnection speed is proportional to the square root of the injected power, as predicted by the model. The dependence on the injection scale for some of our models is a bit weaker than expected, i.e., l 3/4 inj , compared to the predicted linear dependence on the injection scale, which may require some refinement of the model or may be due to effects such as the finite size of the excitation region, which are not a part of the model. The reconnection speed was found to depend on the expected rate of magnetic field wandering and not on the magnitude of the guide field. In our models, we see no dependence on the guide field when its strength is comparable to the reconnected component. More importantly, while in the absence of turbulence we successfully reproduce the Sweet–Parker scaling of reconnection, in the presence of turbulence we do not observe any dependence on Ohmic resistivity, confirming that the reconnection of the weakly stochastic field is fast. We also do not observe a dependence on anomalous resistivity, which suggests that the presence of anomalous effects, e.g., Hall MHD effects, may be irrelevant for astrophysical systems with weakly stochastic magnetic fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
�ber die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik
Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., & Lewy, H. (1928) · Mathematische Annalen · doi:10.1007/bf01448839 · Cited by 4,106
On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
Harten, A., Lax, P. D., & Leer, B. V. (1983) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/1025002 · Cited by 3,429
McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, E. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602 · Cited by 2,478
Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence
Goldreich, P., & Sridhar, S. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/175121 · Cited by 2,240
An unusual supernova in the error box of the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998
Galama, T. J., Vreeswijk, P. M., van Paradijs, J., Kouveliotou, C., Augusteijn, T., Böhnhardt, H., Brewer, J. P., Doublier, V., Gonzalez, J.-F., Leibundgut, B., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27150 · Cited by 1,921
Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids
Stevenson, D. J. (1979) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90142-8 · Cited by 1,809
Inertial-Range Spectrum of Hydromagnetic Turbulence
Kraichnan, R. H. (1965) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.1761412 · Cited by 1,727
Magnetic Reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications
Priest, E., & Forbes, T. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511525087 · Cited by 1,530
Interstellar Turbulence I: Observations and Processes
Elmegreen, B. G., & Scalo, J. (2004) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094859 · Cited by 1,175
Discovery of the peculiar supernova 1998bw in the error box of GRB980425
Galama, T. J., Vreeswijk, P. M., van Paradijs, J., Kouveliotou, C., Augusteijn, T., Hainaut, O., Patat, F., Boehnhardt, H., Brewer, J., Doublier, V., et al. (1998) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9806175 · Cited by 1,013
Cited by
Stellar Spin-Orbit Misalignment in a Multiplanet System
Huber, D., Carter, J. A., Barbieri, M., Miglio, A., Deck, K. M., Fabrycky, D. C., Montet, B. T., Buchhave, L. A., Chaplin, W. J., Hekker, S., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242066 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- Kowal, G., Lazarian, A., Vishniac, E. T., & Otmianowska-Mazur, K.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-06-30
- Volume
- 700
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-85
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2003666254
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NUMERICAL TESTS OF FAST RECONNECTION IN WEAKLY STOCHASTIC MAGNETIC FIELDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/63
- The paper
- Kowal, G., Lazarian, A., Vishniac, E. T., & Otmianowska-Mazur, K. (2009). NUMERICAL TESTS OF FAST RECONNECTION IN WEAKLY STOCHASTIC MAGNETIC FIELDS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/63
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.