Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 669

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

STATISTICS OF 207 Lyα EMITTERS AT A REDSHIFT NEAR 7: CONSTRAINTS ON REIONIZATION AND GALAXY FORMATION MODELS

Open access
Ouchi, Masami, Shimasaku, Kazuhiro, Furusawa, Hisanori, Saito, Tomoki, Yoshida, Makiko, Akiyama, Masayuki, Ono, Yoshiaki, Yamada, Toru, Ota, Kazuaki, Kashikawa, Nobunari, Iye, Masanori, Kodama, Tadayuki, Okamura, Sadanori, Simpson, Chris, Yoshida, Michitoshi·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present the Lyα luminosity function (LF), clustering measurements, and Lyα line profiles based on the largest sample to date of 207 Lyα emitters (LAEs) at z = 6.6 on the 1 deg 2 sky of Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey field. Our z = 6.6 Lyα LF including cosmic variance estimates yields the best-fit Schechter parameters of ϕ* = 8.5 +3.0 −2.2 × 10 −4 Mpc −3 and L * Lyα = 4.4 +0.6 −0.6 × 10 42 erg s −1 with a fixed α = −1.5, and indicates a decrease from z = 5.7 at the ≳90% confidence level. However, this decrease is not large, only ≃30% in Lyα luminosity, which is too small to have been identified in the previous studies. A clustering signal of z = 6.6 LAEs is detected for the first time. We obtain the correlation length of r 0 = 2–5 h −1 100 Mpc and a bias of b = 3–6, and find no significant boost of clustering amplitude by reionization at z = 6.6. The average hosting dark halo mass inferred from clustering is 10 10 –10 11 M ☉ , and a duty cycle of LAE population is roughly ∼1%, albeit with large uncertainties. The average of our high-quality Keck/DEIMOS spectra shows an FWHM velocity width of 251 ± 16 km s −1 . We find no large evolution of the Lyα line profile from z = 5.7 to 6.6, and no anti-correlation between Lyα luminosity and line width at z = 6.6. The combination of various reionization models and our observational results about the LF, clustering, and line profile indicates that there would exist a small decrease of the intergalactic medium's (IGM's) Lyα transmission owing to reionization, but that the hydrogen IGM is not highly neutral at z = 6.6. Our neutral-hydrogen fraction constraint implies that the major reionization process took place at z ≳ 7.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/869

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 669

Metadata

Authors
Ouchi, M., Shimasaku, K., Furusawa, H., Saito, T., Yoshida, M., Akiyama, M., Ono, Y., Yamada, T., Ota, K., Kashikawa, N., Iye, M., Kodama, T., Okamura, S., Simpson, C., & Yoshida, M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-10-15
Volume
723
Issue
1
Pages
869-894
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2013741966
Cited by
669
References
4
FWCI
24.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STATISTICS OF 207 Lyα EMITTERS AT A REDSHIFT NEAR 7: CONSTRAINTS ON REIONIZATION AND GALAXY FORMATION MODELS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/869
The paper
Ouchi, M., Shimasaku, K., Furusawa, H., Saito, T., Yoshida, M., Akiyama, M., Ono, Y., Yamada, T., Ota, K., Kashikawa, N., Iye, M., Kodama, T., Okamura, S., Simpson, C., & Yoshida, M. (2010). STATISTICS OF 207 Lyα EMITTERS AT A REDSHIFT NEAR 7: CONSTRAINTS ON REIONIZATION AND GALAXY FORMATION MODELS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/869

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.