The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MODELING THE EFFECTS OF STAR FORMATION HISTORIES ON Hα AND ULTRAVIOLET FLUXES IN NEARBY DWARF GALAXIES
Open accessAbstract
We consider the effects of non-constant star formation histories (SFHs) on Hα and GALEX far-ultraviolet (FUV) star formation rate (SFR) indicators. Under the assumption of a fully populated Chabrier initial mass function (IMF), we compare the distribution of Hα-to-FUV flux ratios from ∼1500 simple, periodic model SFHs with observations of 185 galaxies from the Spitzer Local Volume Legacy survey. We find a set of SFH models that are well matched to the data, such that more massive galaxies are best characterized by nearly constant SFHs, while low-mass systems experience burst amplitudes of ∼30 (i.e., an increase in the SFR by a factor of 30 over the SFR during the inter-burst period), burst durations of tens of Myr, and periods of ∼250 Myr; these SFHs are broadly consistent with the increased stochastic star formation expected in systems with lower SFRs. We analyze the predicted temporal evolution of galaxy stellar mass, R -band surface brightness, Hα-derived SFR, and blue luminosity, and find that they provide a reasonable match to observed flux distributions. We find that our model SFHs are generally able to reproduce both the observed systematic decline and increased scatter in Hα-to-FUV ratios toward low-mass systems, without invoking other physical mechanisms. We also compare our predictions with those from the Integrated Galactic IMF theory with a constant SFR. We find that while both predict a systematic decline in the observed ratios, only the time variable SFH models are capable of producing the observed population of low-mass galaxies ( M * ≲ 10 7 M ☉ ) with normal Hα-to-FUV ratios. These results demonstrate that a variable IMF alone has difficulty explaining the observed scatter in the Hα-to-FUV ratios. We conclude by considering the limitations of the model SFHs and discuss the use of additional empirical constraints to improve future SFH modeling efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341
THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY IN NEARBY GALAXIES: MEASURING WHERE GAS FORMS STARS EFFECTIVELY
Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Madore, B., & Thornley, M. D. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782 · Cited by 1,919
Star-Formation Histories, Abundances, and Kinematics of Dwarf Galaxies in the Local Group
Tolstoy, E., Hill, V., & Tosi, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101650 · Cited by 1,179
The Recent Star Formation Histories of M81 Group Dwarf Irregular Galaxies
Weisz, D. R., Skillman, E. D., Cannon, J. M., Dolphin, A. E., Kennicutt, Jr., Lee, J., & Walter, F. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/592323 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Cited by
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“Recent modelling of the statistics of Hα and UV emission by Weisz et al. (2012) and Fumagalli et al. (2011) as well as analysis of resolved stellar populations (e.g., Weisz et al. 2008) confirm the importance of fluctuations in the SFR.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationDark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Cusp-core transformations in dwarf galaxies: observational predictions
Teyssier, R., Pontzen, A., Dubois, Y., & Read, J. I. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts563 · Cited by 434
Krumholz, M. R. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.001 · Cited by 321
Dark matter cores all the way down
Read, J. I., Agertz, O., & Collins, M. L. M. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw713 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Weisz, D. R., Johnson, B. D., Johnson, L. C., Skillman, E. D., Lee, J. C., Kennicutt, R. C., Calzetti, D., van Zee, L., Bothwell, M. S., Dalcanton, J. J., Dale, D. A., & Williams, B. F.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-12-13
- Volume
- 744
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2066010509
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MODELING THE EFFECTS OF STAR FORMATION HISTORIES ON Hα AND ULTRAVIOLET FLUXES IN NEARBY DWARF GALAXIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/44
- The paper
- Weisz, D. R., Johnson, B. D., Johnson, L. C., Skillman, E. D., Lee, J. C., Kennicutt, R. C., Calzetti, D., van Zee, L., Bothwell, M. S., Dalcanton, J. J., Dale, D. A., & Williams, B. F. (2012). MODELING THE EFFECTS OF STAR FORMATION HISTORIES ON Hα AND ULTRAVIOLET FLUXES IN NEARBY DWARF GALAXIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.