The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE FREQUENCY OF HOT JUPITERS ORBITING NEARBY SOLAR-TYPE STARS
Open accessAbstract
We determine the fraction of F, G, and K dwarfs in the solar neighborhood hosting hot Jupiters as measured by the California Planet Survey from the Lick and Keck planet searches. We find the rate to be 1.2% ± 0.38%, which is consistent with the rate reported by Mayor et al. from the HARPS and CORALIE radial velocity (RV) surveys. These numbers are more than double the rate reported by Howard et al. for Kepler stars and the rate of Gould et al. from the OGLE-III transit search; however, due to small number statistics these differences are of only marginal statistical significance. We explore some of the difficulties in estimating this rate from the existing RV data sets and comparing RV rates to rates from other techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Discovery and characterization of thousands of hot Jupiters in exoplanetary systems via the transit method ( Wright et al. 2012 ) .”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Wright et al. 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378355a0 · Cited by 4,111
The Planet‐Metallicity Correlation
Fischer, D. A., & Valenti, J. A. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428383 · Cited by 1,641
Self-citationDetection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312457 · Cited by 1,415
A Transiting “51 Peg–like” Planet
Henry, G. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312458 · Cited by 964
Self-citationButler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Vogt, S. S., Tinney, C. G., Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D., Johnson, J. A., McCarthy, C., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/504701 · Cited by 914
Self-citationCumming, A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Vogt, S. S., Wright, J. T., & Fischer, D. A. (2008) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/588487 · Cited by 892
Self-citationKEPLERINPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION
Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A. (2011) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112 · Cited by 868
Giant Planet Occurrence in the Stellar Mass-Metallicity Plane
Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., & Crepp, J. R. (2010) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/655775 · Cited by 782
Self-citationThe metal-rich nature of stars with planets
Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. (2001) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010648 · Cited by 502
ELODIE metallicity-biased search for transiting Hot Jupiters
Bouchy, F., Udry, S., Mayor, M., Moutou, C., Pont, F. J., Iribarne, N., da Silva, R., Ilovaisky, S. A., Queloz, D. P., Santos, N. C., et al. (2005) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200500201 · Cited by 495
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bonfils, 2011, A&A
- Borucki, 2010, BAAS, 41, 215
- Gould, 2006, Acta Astron., 56, 1
- Howard, 2011, ApJ
- Malmquist, 1920, Medd. Lund. Astron. Obs., 22, 1
- Mayor, 2011, A&A
- Perryman, 1997, The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO Catalogues, Astrometric and Photometric Star Catalogues Derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
“• Discovery and characterization of thousands of hot Jupiters in exoplanetary systems via the transit method (Wright et al. 2012).”
MethodThe Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems
Winn, J. N., & Fabrycky, D. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122246 · Cited by 926
“The discrepancy might be attributable to differences in metallicity or the frequency of multiple-star systems between the two samples (Gould et al. 2006, Bayliss & Sackett 2011, Wright et al. 2012).”
BackgroundThe NASA Exoplanet Archive: Data and Tools for Exoplanet Research
Akeson, R., Chen, X., Ciardi, D. R., Crane, M. K., Good, J., Harbut, M., Jackson, E. S., Kane, S. R., Laity, A. C., Leifer, S. D., et al. (2013) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/672273 · Cited by 906
“This includes high-resolution spectra from the N2K Consortium (Fischer et al. 2007), the M2K program (Fischer et al. 2012), and the California Planet search team (Wright et al. 2012).”
MethodDawson, R. I., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 · Cited by 622
Self-citationImaging Extrasolar Giant Planets
Bowler, B. P. (2016) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/968/102001 · Cited by 450
“…stellar host mass, the overall giant planet occurrence rate for the full sample of 384 stars is 0.6+0.7 −0.5%, which happens to be comparable to the frequency of hot Jupiters around FGK stars in the field (1.2 ± 0.4%; Wright et al. 2012) and in the Kepler sample (0.5 ± 0.1%; Howard et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Morton, T. D., & Fischer, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wright, J. T.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2012-06-25
- Volume
- 753
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2158240367
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 14.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
- Keywords
- hot Jupiters, solar-type stars, planet occurrence rate, radial velocity surveys, transit surveys, Kepler, OGLE-III, Lick Observatory, Keck Observatory, nearby stars
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
