Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DUST EXTINCTION FROM BALMER DECREMENTS OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT 0.75 ⩽z⩽ 1.5 WITH HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE/WIDE-FIELD-CAMERA 3 SPECTROSCOPY FROM THE WFC3 INFRARED SPECTROSCOPIC PARALLEL SURVEY

Open access
Domínguez, A., Siana, B., Henry, A. L., Scarlata, C., Bedregal, A. G., Malkan, M., Atek, H., Ross, N. R., Colbert, J. W., Teplitz, H. I., Rafelski, M., McCarthy, P., Bunker, A., Hathi, N. P., Dressler, A., Martin, C. L., Masters, D.·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Spectroscopic observations of Hα and Hβ emission lines of 128 star-forming galaxies in the redshift range 0.75 ⩽ z ⩽ 1.5 are presented. These data were taken with slitless spectroscopy using the G102 and G141 grisms of the Wide-Field-Camera 3 (WFC3) on board the Hubble Space Telescope as part of the WFC3 Infrared Spectroscopic Parallel survey. Interstellar dust extinction is measured from stacked spectra that cover the Balmer decrement (Hα/Hβ). We present dust extinction as a function of Hα luminosity (down to 3 × 10 41 erg s −1 ), galaxy stellar mass (reaching 4 × 10 8 M ☉ ), and rest-frame Hα equivalent width. The faintest galaxies are two times fainter in Hα luminosity than galaxies previously studied at z ∼ 1.5. An evolution is observed where galaxies of the same Hα luminosity have lower extinction at higher redshifts, whereas no evolution is found within our error bars with stellar mass. The lower Hα luminosity galaxies in our sample are found to be consistent with no dust extinction. We find an anti-correlation of the [O iii ] λ5007/Hα flux ratio as a function of luminosity where galaxies with L Hα < 5 × 10 41 erg s −1 are brighter in [O iii ] λ5007 than Hα. This trend is evident even after extinction correction, suggesting that the increased [O iii ] λ5007/Hα ratio in low-luminosity galaxies is likely due to lower metallicity and/or higher ionization parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/145

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Domínguez, A., Siana, B., Henry, A. L., Scarlata, C., Bedregal, A. G., Malkan, M., Atek, H., Ross, N. R., Colbert, J. W., Teplitz, H. I., Rafelski, M., McCarthy, P., Bunker, A., Hathi, N. P., Dressler, A., Martin, C. L., & Masters, D.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-01-17
Volume
763
Issue
2
Pages
145
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1851823814
Cited by
282
References
44
FWCI
12.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DUST EXTINCTION FROM BALMER DECREMENTS OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT 0.75 ⩽z⩽ 1.5 WITH HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE/WIDE-FIELD-CAMERA 3 SPECTROSCOPY FROM THE WFC3 INFRARED SPECTROSCOPIC PARALLEL SURVEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/145
The paper
Domínguez, A., Siana, B., Henry, A. L., Scarlata, C., Bedregal, A. G., Malkan, M., Atek, H., Ross, N. R., Colbert, J. W., Teplitz, H. I., Rafelski, M., McCarthy, P., Bunker, A., Hathi, N. P., Dressler, A., Martin, C. L., & Masters, D. (2013). DUST EXTINCTION FROM BALMER DECREMENTS OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT 0.75 ⩽z⩽ 1.5 WITH HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE/WIDE-FIELD-CAMERA 3 SPECTROSCOPY FROM THE WFC3 INFRARED SPECTROSCOPIC PARALLEL SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/145

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.