The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
REVISITING THE SCALING RELATIONS OF BLACK HOLE MASSES AND HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES
Open accessAbstract
New kinematic data and modeling efforts in the past few years have substantially expanded and revised dynamical measurements of black hole masses ( M • ) at the centers of nearby galaxies. Here we compile an updated sample of 72 black holes and their host galaxies, and present revised scaling relations between M • and stellar velocity dispersion (σ), V -band luminosity ( L ), and bulge stellar mass ( M bulge ), for different galaxy subsamples. Our best-fitting power-law relations for the full galaxy sample are log 10 ( M • ) = 8.32 + 5.64log 10 (σ/200 km s −1 ), log 10 ( M • ) = 9.23 + 1.11log 10 ( L /10 11 L ☉ ), and log 10 ( M • ) = 8.46 + 1.05log 10 ( M bulge /10 11 M ☉ ). A log-quadratic fit to the M • –σ relation with an additional term of β 2 [log 10 (σ/200 km s −1 )] 2 gives β 2 = 1.68 ± 1.82 and does not decrease the intrinsic scatter in M • . Including 92 additional upper limits on M • does not change the slope of the M • –σ relation. When the early- and late-type galaxies are fit separately, we obtain similar slopes of 5.20 and 5.06 for the M • –σ relation but significantly different intercepts— M • in early-type galaxies are about two times higher than in late types at a given sigma. Within early-type galaxies, our fits to M • (σ) give M • that is about two times higher in galaxies with central core profiles than those with central power-law profiles. Our M • – L and M • – M bulge relations for early-type galaxies are similar to those from earlier compilations, and core and power-law galaxies yield similar L - and M bulge -based predictions for M • . When the conventional quadrature method is used to determine the intrinsic scatter in M • , our data set shows weak evidence for increased scatter at M bulge < 10 11 M ☉ or L V < 10 10.3 L ☉ , while the scatter stays constant for 10 11 < M bulge < 10 12.3 M ☉ and 10 10.3 < L V < 10 11.5 L ☉ . A Bayesian analysis indicates that a larger sample of M • measurements would be needed to detect any statistically significant trend in the scatter with galaxy properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bender, R., Kormendy, J., Bower, G., Green, R., Thomas, J., Danks, A. C., Gull, T., Hutchings, J. B., Joseph, C. L., Kaiser, M. E., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/432434 · Cited by 267
Cited by
The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2058 · Cited by 3,601
Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations
Crain, R. A., Schaye, J., Bower, R. G., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv725 · Cited by 1,451
EPTA Collaboration and InPTA Collaboration:, Antoniadis, J., Arumugam, P., Arumugam, S., Babak, S., Bagchi, M., Bak Nielsen, A.-S., Bassa, C. G., Bathula, A., Berthereau, A., et al. (2023) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 · Cited by 1,044
RELATIONS BETWEEN CENTRAL BLACK HOLE MASS AND TOTAL GALAXY STELLAR MASS IN THE LOCAL UNIVERSE
Reines, A. E., & Volonteri, M. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/2/82 · Cited by 849
Metadata
- Authors
- McConnell, N. J., & Ma, C.-P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-02-05
- Volume
- 764
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1990401433
- Cited by
- 1,279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REVISITING THE SCALING RELATIONS OF BLACK HOLE MASSES AND HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/184
- The paper
- McConnell, N. J., & Ma, C.-P. (2013). REVISITING THE SCALING RELATIONS OF BLACK HOLE MASSES AND HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/184
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.