Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

REVISITING THE SCALING RELATIONS OF BLACK HOLE MASSES AND HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES

Open access
McConnell, Nicholas J., Ma, Chung-Pei·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

New kinematic data and modeling efforts in the past few years have substantially expanded and revised dynamical measurements of black hole masses ( M • ) at the centers of nearby galaxies. Here we compile an updated sample of 72 black holes and their host galaxies, and present revised scaling relations between M • and stellar velocity dispersion (σ), V -band luminosity ( L ), and bulge stellar mass ( M bulge ), for different galaxy subsamples. Our best-fitting power-law relations for the full galaxy sample are log 10 ( M • ) = 8.32 + 5.64log 10 (σ/200 km s −1 ), log 10 ( M • ) = 9.23 + 1.11log 10 ( L /10 11 L ☉ ), and log 10 ( M • ) = 8.46 + 1.05log 10 ( M bulge /10 11 M ☉ ). A log-quadratic fit to the M • –σ relation with an additional term of β 2 [log 10 (σ/200 km s −1 )] 2 gives β 2 = 1.68 ± 1.82 and does not decrease the intrinsic scatter in M • . Including 92 additional upper limits on M • does not change the slope of the M • –σ relation. When the early- and late-type galaxies are fit separately, we obtain similar slopes of 5.20 and 5.06 for the M • –σ relation but significantly different intercepts— M • in early-type galaxies are about two times higher than in late types at a given sigma. Within early-type galaxies, our fits to M • (σ) give M • that is about two times higher in galaxies with central core profiles than those with central power-law profiles. Our M • – L and M • – M bulge relations for early-type galaxies are similar to those from earlier compilations, and core and power-law galaxies yield similar L - and M bulge -based predictions for M • . When the conventional quadrature method is used to determine the intrinsic scatter in M • , our data set shows weak evidence for increased scatter at M bulge < 10 11 M ☉ or L V < 10 10.3 L ☉ , while the scatter stays constant for 10 11 < M bulge < 10 12.3 M ☉ and 10 10.3 < L V < 10 11.5 L ☉ . A Bayesian analysis indicates that a larger sample of M • measurements would be needed to detect any statistically significant trend in the scatter with galaxy properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/184

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,279

Metadata

Authors
McConnell, N. J., & Ma, C.-P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-02-05
Volume
764
Issue
2
Pages
184
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1990401433
Cited by
1,279
References
1
FWCI
59.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REVISITING THE SCALING RELATIONS OF BLACK HOLE MASSES AND HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/184
The paper
McConnell, N. J., & Ma, C.-P. (2013). REVISITING THE SCALING RELATIONS OF BLACK HOLE MASSES AND HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.