The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE PSEUDO-EVOLUTION OF HALO MASS
Open accessAbstract
A dark matter halo is commonly defined as a spherical overdensity of matter with respect to a reference density, such as the critical density or the mean matter density of the universe. Such definitions can lead to a spurious pseudo-evolution of halo mass simply due to redshift evolution of the reference density, even if its physical density profile remains constant over time. We estimate the amount of such pseudo-evolution of mass between z = 1 and 0 for halos identified in a large N -body simulation, and show that it accounts for almost the entire mass evolution of the majority of halos with and can be a significant fraction of the apparent mass growth even for cluster-sized halos. We estimate the magnitude of the pseudo-evolution assuming that halo density profiles remain static in physical coordinates, and show that this simple model predicts the pseudo-evolution of halos identified in numerical simulations to good accuracy, albeit with significant scatter. We discuss the impact of pseudo-evolution on the evolution of the halo mass function and show that the non-evolution of the low-mass end of the halo mass function is the result of a fortuitous cancellation between pseudo-evolution and the absorption of small halos into larger hosts. We also show that the evolution of the low-mass end of the concentration–mass relation observed in simulations is almost entirely due to the pseudo-evolution of mass. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for the interpretation of the evolution of various scaling relations between the observable properties of galaxies and galaxy clusters and their halo masses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Cited by
UniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0−10
Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 · Cited by 1,243
MultiDark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles
Klypin, A., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., Prada, F., & Heß, S. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw248 · Cited by 970
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
COLOSSUS: A Python Toolkit for Cosmology, Large-scale Structure, and Dark Matter Halos
Diemer, B. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaee8c · Cited by 494
Self-citationemerge – an empirical model for the formation of galaxies since z ∼ 10
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty655 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Diemer, B., More, S., & Kravtsov, A. V.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-03-04
- Volume
- 766
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1991994011
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE PSEUDO-EVOLUTION OF HALO MASS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/25
- The paper
- Diemer, B., More, S., & Kravtsov, A. V. (2013). THE PSEUDO-EVOLUTION OF HALO MASS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.