The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER AND THE OCCURRENCE OF PLANETS
Open accessAbstract
The Kepler mission is uniquely suited to study the frequencies of extrasolar planets. This goal requires knowledge of the incidence of false positives such as eclipsing binaries in the background of the targets, or physically bound to them, which can mimic the photometric signal of a transiting planet. We perform numerical simulations of the Kepler targets and of physical companions or stars in the background to predict the occurrence of astrophysical false positives detectable by the mission. Using real noise level estimates, we compute the number and characteristics of detectable eclipsing pairs involving main-sequence stars and non-main-sequence stars or planets, and we quantify the fraction of those that would pass the Kepler candidate vetting procedure. By comparing their distribution with that of the Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) detected during the first six quarters of operation of the spacecraft, we infer the false positive rate of Kepler and study its dependence on spectral type, candidate planet size, and orbital period. We find that the global false positive rate of Kepler is 9.4%, peaking for giant planets (6–22 R ⊕ ) at 17.7%, reaching a low of 6.7% for small Neptunes (2–4 R ⊕ ), and increasing again for Earth-size planets (0.8–1.25 R ⊕ ) to 12.3%. Most importantly, we also quantify and characterize the distribution and rate of occurrence of planets down to Earth size with no prior assumptions on their frequency, by subtracting from the population of actual Kepler candidates our simulated population of astrophysical false positives. We find that 16.5% ± 3.6% of main-sequence FGK stars have at least one planet between 0.8 and 1.25 R ⊕ with orbital periods up to 85 days. This result is a significant step toward the determination of eta-earth, the occurrence of Earth-like planets in the habitable zone of their parent stars. There is no significant dependence of the rates of planet occurrence between 0.8 and 4 Earth radii with spectral type. In the process, we also derive a prescription for the signal recovery rate of Kepler that enables a good match to both the KOI size and orbital period distribution, as well as their signal-to-noise distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T. M., Bryson, S. T., Caldwell, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/19 · Cited by 1,042
Self-citationGiant Planet Occurrence in the Stellar Mass-Metallicity Plane
Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., & Crepp, J. R. (2010) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/655775 · Cited by 782
Kepler-22b: A 2.4 EARTH-RADIUS PLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE OF A SUN-LIKE STAR
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Batalha, N., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J., Fressin, F., Torres, G., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/120 · Cited by 241
Self-citationTwo Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20
Fressin, F., Torres, G., Rowe, J. F., Charbonneau, D., Rogers, L. A., Ballard, S., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., Buchhave, L. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10780 · Cited by 183
Self-citationPlanetary Candidates Observed by Kepler, III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1202.5852 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Cited by
Clouds in the atmosphere of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ 1214b
Kreidberg, L., Bean, J. L., Désert, J.-M., Benneke, B., Deming, D., Stevenson, K. B., Seager, S., Berta-Thompson, Z., Seifahrt, A., & Homeier, D. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12888 · Cited by 939
UNDERSTANDING THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR SUB-NEPTUNES: RADIUS AS A PROXY FOR COMPOSITION
Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/1 · Cited by 722
Kempton, E. M.-R., Bean, J. L., Louie, D. R., Deming, D., Koll, D. D. B., Mansfield, M., Christiansen, J. L., López-Morales, M., Swain, M. R., Zellem, R. T., et al. (2018) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aadf6f · Cited by 587
Self-citationA chemical survey of exoplanets with ARIEL
Tinetti, G., Drossart, P., Eccleston, P., Hartogh, P., Heske, A., Leconte, J., Micela, G., Ollivier, M., Pilbratt, G., Puig, L., et al. (2018) · Experimental Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s10686-018-9598-x · Cited by 445
State of the Field: Extreme Precision Radial Velocities
Fischer, D. A., Anglada-Escude, G., Arriagada, P., Baluev, R. V., Bean, J. L., Bouchy, F., Buchhave, L. A., Carroll, T., Chakraborty, A., Crepp, J. R., et al. (2016) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/964/066001 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Fressin, F., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., Bryson, S. T., Christiansen, J., Dressing, C. D., Jenkins, J. M., Walkowicz, L. M., & Batalha, N. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-03-12
- Volume
- 766
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1981043055
- Cited by
- 1,139
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 68.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER AND THE OCCURRENCE OF PLANETS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/81
- The paper
- Fressin, F., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., Bryson, S. T., Christiansen, J., Dressing, C. D., Jenkins, J. M., Walkowicz, L. M., & Batalha, N. M. (2013). THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER AND THE OCCURRENCE OF PLANETS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/81
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.