The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE ROLE OF CORE MASS IN CONTROLLING EVAPORATION: THE KEPLER RADIUS DISTRIBUTION AND THE KEPLER-36 DENSITY DICHOTOMY
Open accessAbstract
We use models of coupled thermal evolution and photo-evaporative mass loss to understand the formation and evolution of the Kepler-36 system. We show that the large contrast in mean planetary density observed by Carter et al. can be explained as a natural consequence of photo-evaporation from planets that formed with similar initial compositions. However, rather than being due to differences in XUV irradiation between the planets, we find that this contrast is due to the difference in the masses of the planets' rock/iron cores and the impact that this has on mass-loss evolution. We explore in detail how our coupled models depend on irradiation, mass, age, composition, and the efficiency of mass loss. Based on fits to large numbers of coupled evolution and mass-loss runs, we provide analytic fits to understand threshold XUV fluxes for significant atmospheric loss, as a function of core mass and mass-loss efficiency. Finally we discuss these results in the context of recent studies of the radius distribution of Kepler candidates. Using our parameter study, we make testable predictions for the frequency of sub-Neptune-sized planets. We show that 1.8–4.0 R ⊕ planets should become significantly less common on orbits within 10 days and discuss the possibility of a narrow "occurrence valley" in the radius–flux distribution. Moreover, we describe how photo-evaporation provides a natural explanation for the recent observations of Ciardi et al. that inner planets are preferentially smaller within the systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An extended upper atmosphere around the extrasolar planet HD209458b
Vidal-Madjar, A., des Etangs, A. L., Désert, J.-M., Ballester, G. E., Ferlet, R., Hébrard, G., & Mayor, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01448 · Cited by 1,208 · cited 1×
“…Des Etangs 2007; Hubbard et al. 2007a, 2007b; Davis & Wheatley 2009; Ehrenreich & Désert 2011) and direct detections of atmospheric escape (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003, 2004; Linsky et al. 2010; Lecavelier Des Etangs et al. 2010; Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2012; Haswell et al. 2012;…”
The dynamics of a rapidly escaping atmosphere: Applications to the evolution of Earth and Venus
Watson, A. J., Donahue, T. M., & Walker, J. C. G. (1981) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(81)90101-9 · Cited by 598
DENSITY AND ECCENTRICITY OF KEPLER PLANETS
Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/74 · Cited by 231
Two Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20
Fressin, F., Torres, G., Rowe, J. F., Charbonneau, D., Rogers, L. A., Ballard, S., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., Buchhave, L. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10780 · Cited by 183
ON THE RELATIVE SIZES OF PLANETS WITHIN KEPLER MULTIPLE-CANDIDATE SYSTEMS
Ciardi, D. R., Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., Gautier, T. N., Howell, S. B., Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., & Rowe, J. F. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/41 · Cited by 130
Cited by
UNDERSTANDING THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR SUB-NEPTUNES: RADIUS AS A PROXY FOR COMPOSITION
Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/1 · Cited by 722
Self-citationDawson, R. I., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 · Cited by 622
Thompson, S. E., Coughlin, J. L., Hoffman, K., Mullally, F., Christiansen, J. L., Burke, C. J., Bryson, S., Batalha, N., Haas, M. R., Catanzarite, J., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9 · Cited by 429
The California-Kepler Survey. IV. Metal-rich Stars Host a Greater Diversity of Planets
Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W., Winn, J. N., Weiss, L. M., Fulton, B. J., Howard, A. W., Sinukoff, E., Isaacson, H., Morton, T. D., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa54c · Cited by 363
BREEDING SUPER-EARTHS AND BIRTHING SUPER-PUFFS IN TRANSITIONAL DISKS
Lee, E. J., & Chiang, E. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/817/2/90 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-09-17
- Volume
- 776
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2952629541
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE ROLE OF CORE MASS IN CONTROLLING EVAPORATION: THE KEPLER RADIUS DISTRIBUTION AND THE KEPLER-36 DENSITY DICHOTOMY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/2
- The paper
- Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. (2013). THE ROLE OF CORE MASS IN CONTROLLING EVAPORATION: THE KEPLER RADIUS DISTRIBUTION AND THE KEPLER-36 DENSITY DICHOTOMY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.