The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EVOLUTION OF INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM MASS PROBED BY DUST EMISSION: ALMA OBSERVATIONS AT z= 0.3-2
Open accessAbstract
The use of submillimeter dust continuum emission to probe the mass of interstellar dust and gas in galaxies is empirically calibrated using samples of local star-forming galaxies, Planck observations of the Milky Way, and high-redshift submillimeter galaxies. All of these objects suggest a similar calibration, strongly supporting the view that the Rayleigh–Jeans tail of the dust emission can be used as an accurate and very fast probe of the interstellar medium (ISM) in galaxies. We present ALMA Cycle 0 observations of the Band 7 (350 GHz) dust emission in 107 galaxies from z = 0.2 to 2.5. Three samples of galaxies with a total of 101 galaxies were stellar-mass-selected from COSMOS to have M * ≃ 10 11 M ☉ : 37 at z ∼ 0.4, 33 at z ∼ 0.9, and 31 at z = 2. A fourth sample with six infrared-luminous galaxies at z = 2 was observed for comparison with the purely mass-selected samples. From the fluxes detected in the stacked images for each sample, we find that the ISM content has decreased by a factor ∼6 from 1 to 2 × 10 10 M ☉ at both z = 2 and 0.9 down to ∼2 × 10 9 M ☉ at z = 0.4. The infrared-luminous sample at z = 2 shows a further ∼4 times increase in M ISM compared with the equivalent non-infrared-bright sample at the same redshift. The gas mass fractions are ∼2% ± 0.5%, 12% ± 3%, 14% ± 2%, and 53% ± 3% for the four subsamples ( z = 0.4, 0.9, and 2 and infrared-bright galaxies).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Draine, B. T., & Li, A. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/511055 · Cited by 2,122
Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium
Draine, B. T. (2011) · doi:10.1515/9781400839087 · Cited by 1,787
Cited by
Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework
Somerville, R. S., & Davé, R. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 · Cited by 1,442
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Scoville, N., Sheth, K., Aussel, H., Bout, P. V., Capak, P., Bongiorno, A., Casey, C. M., Murchikova, L., Koda, J., Álvarez-Márquez, J., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/83 · Cited by 513
Self-citationBéthermin, M., Daddi, E., Magdis, G., Lagos, C., Sargent, M., Albrecht, M., Aussel, H., Bertoldi, F., Buat, V., Galametz, M., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425031 · Cited by 305
Self-citationDaddi, E., Dannerbauer, H., Liu, D., Aravena, M., Bournaud, F., Walter, F., Riechers, D., Magdis, G., Sargent, M., Béthermin, M., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425043 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Scoville, N., Aussel, H., Sheth, K., Scott, K. S., Sanders, D., Ivison, R., Pope, A., Capak, P., Vanden Bout, P., Manohar, S., Kartaltepe, J., Robertson, B., & Lilly, S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-02-20
- Volume
- 783
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 84
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2127629232
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EVOLUTION OF INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM MASS PROBED BY DUST EMISSION: ALMA OBSERVATIONS AT z= 0.3-2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/783/2/84
- The paper
- Scoville, N., Aussel, H., Sheth, K., Scott, K. S., Sanders, D., Ivison, R., Pope, A., Capak, P., Vanden Bout, P., Manohar, S., Kartaltepe, J., Robertson, B., & Lilly, S. (2014). THE EVOLUTION OF INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM MASS PROBED BY DUST EMISSION: ALMA OBSERVATIONS AT z= 0.3-2. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/783/2/84
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.