Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ISM MASSES AND THE STAR FORMATION LAW AT Z = 1 TO 6: ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF DUST CONTINUUM IN 145 GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS SURVEY FIELD

Open access
Scoville, N., Sheth, K., Aussel, H., Bout, P. Vanden, Capak, P., Bongiorno, A., Casey, C. M., Murchikova, L., Koda, J., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Lee, N., Laigle, C., McCracken, H. J., Ilbert, O., Pope, A., Sanders, D., Chu, J., Toft, S., Ivison, R. J., Manohar, S.·2016·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

ALMA Cycle 2 observations of long-wavelength dust emission in 145 star-forming galaxies are used to probe the evolution of the star-forming interstellar medium (ISM). We also develop a physical basis and empirical calibration (with 72 low-z and z ∼ 2 galaxies) for using the dust continuum as a quantitative probe of ISM masses. The galaxies with the highest star formation rates (SFRs) at = 2.2 and 4.4 have gas masses up to 100 times that of the Milky Way and gas mass fractions reaching 50%–80%, i.e., gas masses 1-4× their stellar masses. We find a single high-z star formation law: yr−1—an approximately linear dependence on the ISM mass and an increased star formation efficiency per unit gas mass at higher redshift. Galaxies above the main sequence (MS) have larger gas masses but are converting their ISM into stars on a timescale only slightly shorter than those on the MS; thus, these “starbursts” are largely the result of having greatly increased gas masses rather than an increased efficiency of converting gas to stars. At z > 1, the entire population of star-forming galaxies has ∼2–5 times shorter gas depletion times than low-z galaxies. These shorter depletion times indicate a different mode of star formation in the early universe—most likely dynamically driven by compressive, high-dispersion gas motions—a natural consequence of the high gas accretion rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/83

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Metadata

Authors
Scoville, N., Sheth, K., Aussel, H., Bout, P. V., Capak, P., Bongiorno, A., Casey, C. M., Murchikova, L., Koda, J., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Lee, N., Laigle, C., McCracken, H. J., Ilbert, O., Pope, A., Sanders, D., Chu, J., Toft, S., Ivison, R. J., & Manohar, S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2016-03-22
Volume
820
Issue
2
Pages
83
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2198891478
Cited by
513
References
70
FWCI
34.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ISM MASSES AND THE STAR FORMATION LAW AT Z = 1 TO 6: ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF DUST CONTINUUM IN 145 GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS SURVEY FIELD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/83
The paper
Scoville, N., Sheth, K., Aussel, H., Bout, P. V., Capak, P., Bongiorno, A., Casey, C. M., Murchikova, L., Koda, J., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Lee, N., Laigle, C., McCracken, H. J., Ilbert, O., Pope, A., Sanders, D., Chu, J., Toft, S., Ivison, R. J., & Manohar, S. (2016). ISM MASSES AND THE STAR FORMATION LAW AT Z = 1 TO 6: ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF DUST CONTINUUM IN 145 GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS SURVEY FIELD. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/83

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.