Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 723

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ARCHITECTURE OF KEPLER'S MULTI-TRANSITING SYSTEMS. II. NEW INVESTIGATIONS WITH TWICE AS MANY CANDIDATES

Open access
Fabrycky, Daniel C., Lissauer, Jack J., Ragozzine, Darin, Rowe, Jason F., Steffen, Jason H., Agol, Eric, Barclay, Thomas, Batalha, Natalie, Borucki, William, Ciardi, David R., Ford, Eric B., Gautier, Thomas N., Geary, John C., Holman, Matthew J., Jenkins, Jon M., Li, Jie, Morehead, Robert C., Morris, Robert L., Shporer, Avi, Smith, Jeffrey C., Still, Martin, Van Cleve, Jeffrey·2014·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We report on the orbital architectures of Kepler systems having multiple-planet candidates identified in the analysis of data from the first six quarters of Kepler data and reported by Batalha et al. (2013). These data show 899 transiting planet candidates in 365 multiple-planet systems and provide a powerful means to study the statistical properties of planetary systems. Using a generic mass–radius relationship, we find that only two pairs of planets in these candidate systems (out of 761 pairs total) appear to be on Hill-unstable orbits, indicating ∼96% of the candidate planetary systems are correctly interpreted as true systems. We find that planet pairs show little statistical preference to be near mean-motion resonances. We identify an asymmetry in the distribution of period ratios near first-order resonances (e.g., 2:1, 3:2), with an excess of planet pairs lying wide of resonance and relatively few lying narrow of resonance. Finally, based upon the transit duration ratios of adjacent planets in each system, we find that the interior planet tends to have a smaller transit impact parameter than the exterior planet does. This finding suggests that the mode of the mutual inclinations of planetary orbital planes is in the range 1 0–2 2, for the packed systems of small planets probed by these observations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/146

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 723

Metadata

Authors
Fabrycky, D. C., Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J. F., Steffen, J. H., Agol, E., Barclay, T., Batalha, N., Borucki, W., Ciardi, D. R., Ford, E. B., Gautier, T. N., Geary, J. C., Holman, M. J., Jenkins, J. M., Li, J., Morehead, R. C., Morris, R. L., Shporer, A., Smith, J. C., Still, M., & Van Cleve, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2014-07-16
Volume
790
Issue
2
Pages
146
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2039484433
Cited by
723
References
3
FWCI
33.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ARCHITECTURE OF KEPLER'S MULTI-TRANSITING SYSTEMS. II. NEW INVESTIGATIONS WITH TWICE AS MANY CANDIDATES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/146
The paper
Fabrycky, D. C., Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J. F., Steffen, J. H., Agol, E., Barclay, T., Batalha, N., Borucki, W., Ciardi, D. R., Ford, E. B., Gautier, T. N., Geary, J. C., Holman, M. J., Jenkins, J. M., Li, J., Morehead, R. C., Morris, R. L., Shporer, A., . . . Van Cleve, J. (2014). ARCHITECTURE OF KEPLER'S MULTI-TRANSITING SYSTEMS. II. NEW INVESTIGATIONS WITH TWICE AS MANY CANDIDATES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.