The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The California-Kepler Survey. V. Peas in a Pod: Planets in a Kepler Multi-planet System Are Similar in Size and Regularly Spaced*
Open accessAbstract
We have established precise planet radii, semimajor axes, incident stellar fluxes, and stellar masses for 909 planets in 355 multi-planet systems discovered by Kepler. In this sample, we find that planets within a single multi-planet system have correlated sizes: each planet is more likely to be the size of its neighbor than a size drawn at random from the distribution of observed planet sizes. In systems with three or more planets, the planets tend to have a regular spacing: the orbital period ratios of adjacent pairs of planets are correlated. Furthermore, the orbital period ratios are smaller in systems with smaller planets, suggesting that the patterns in planet sizes and spacing are linked through formation and/or subsequent orbital dynamics. Yet, we find that essentially no planets have orbital period ratios smaller than 1.2, regardless of planet size. Using empirical mass–radius relationships, we estimate the mutual Hill separations of planet pairs. We find that 93% of the planet pairs are at least 10 mutual Hill radii apart, and that a spacing of ∼20 mutual Hill radii is most common. We also find that when comparing planet sizes, the outer planet is larger in 65% ± 0.4% of cases, and the typical ratio of the outer to inner planet size is positively correlated with the temperature difference between the planets. This could be the result of photo-evaporation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite
Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., Latham, D. W., Bakos, G. Á., Bean, J. L., Berta-Thompson, Z. K., Brown, T. M., Buchhave, L., Butler, N. R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems · doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 · Cited by 4,056
Self-citationOrigin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets
Gomes, R., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K., & Morbidelli, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03676 · Cited by 1,737
The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets*
Fulton, B. J., Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., Isaacson, H., Marcy, G. W., Cargile, P. A., Hebb, L., Weiss, L. M., Johnson, J. A., Morton, T. D., et al. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb · Cited by 1,446
Self-citationKEPLER INPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION
Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A. (2011) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112 · Cited by 845
Oligarchic Growth of Protoplanets
Kokubo, E., & Ida, S. (1998) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1997.5840 · Cited by 808
KEPLER PLANETS: A TALE OF EVAPORATION
Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/105 · Cited by 803
MOST 1.6 EARTH-RADIUS PLANETS ARE NOT ROCKY
Rogers, L. A. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/41 · Cited by 790
ARCHITECTURE AND DYNAMICS OF KEPLER 'S CANDIDATE MULTIPLE TRANSITING PLANET SYSTEMS
Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Fabrycky, D. C., Steffen, J. H., Ford, E. B., Jenkins, J. M., Shporer, A., Holman, M. J., Rowe, J. F., Quintana, E. V., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/8 · Cited by 784
Self-citationFabrycky, D. C., Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J. F., Steffen, J. H., Agol, E., Barclay, T., Batalha, N., Borucki, W., Ciardi, D. R., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/146 · Cited by 723
THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR 65 EXOPLANETS SMALLER THAN 4 EARTH RADII
Weiss, L. M., & Marcy, G. W. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l6 · Cited by 665
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, L. M., Marcy, G. W., Petigura, E. A., Fulton, B. J., Howard, A. W., Winn, J. N., Isaacson, H. T., Morton, T. D., Hirsch, L. A., Sinukoff, E. J., Cumming, A., Hebb, L., & Cargile, P. A.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2018-01-01
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2678281373
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 18.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The California-Kepler Survey. V. Peas in a Pod: Planets in a Kepler Multi-planet System Are Similar in Size and Regularly Spaced*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-3881/aa9ff6
- The paper
- Weiss, L. M., Marcy, G. W., Petigura, E. A., Fulton, B. J., Howard, A. W., Winn, J. N., Isaacson, H. T., Morton, T. D., Hirsch, L. A., Sinukoff, E. J., Cumming, A., Hebb, L., & Cargile, P. A. (2018). The California-Kepler Survey. V. Peas in a Pod: Planets in a Kepler Multi-planet System Are Similar in Size and Regularly Spaced*. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa9ff6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.