The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE END OF THE MACHO ERA, REVISITED: NEW LIMITS ON MACHO MASSES FROM HALO WIDE BINARIES
Open accessAbstract
In order to determine an upper bound for the mass of the massive compact halo objects (MACHOs), we use the halo binaries contained in a recent catalog by Allen & Monroy-Rodríguez. To dynamically model their interactions with massive perturbers, a Monte Carlo simulation is conducted, using an impulsive approximation method and assuming a galactic halo constituted by massive particles of a characteristic mass. The results of such simulations are compared with several subsamples of our improved catalog of candidate halo wide binaries. In accordance with Quinn et al., we also find our results to be very sensitive to the widest binaries. However, our larger sample, together with the fact that we can obtain galactic orbits for 150 of our systems, allows a more reliable estimate of the maximum MACHO mass than that obtained previously. If we employ the entire sample of 211 candidate halo stars we, obtain an upper limit of 112 M ☉ . However, using the 150 binaries in our catalog with computed galactic orbits, we are able to refine our fitting criteria. Thus, for the 100 most halo-like binaries we obtain a maximum MACHO mass of 21–68 M ☉ . Furthermore, we can estimate the dynamical effects of the galactic disk using binary samples that spend progressively shorter times within the disk. By extrapolating the limits obtained for our most reliable—albeit smallest—sample, we find that as the time spent within the disk tends to zero, the upper bound of the MACHO mass tends to less than 5 M ☉ . The non-uniform density of the halo has also been taken into account, but the limit obtained, less than 5 M ☉ , does not differ much from the previous one. Together with microlensing studies that provide lower limits on the MACHO mass, our results essentially exclude the existence of such objects in the galactic halo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bird, S., Cholis, I., Muñoz, J. B., Ali-Haïmoud, Y., Kamionkowski, M., Kovetz, E. D., Raccanelli, A., & Riess, A. G. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.201301 · Cited by 1,226
Constraints on primordial black holes
Carr, B., Kohri, K., Sendouda, Y., & Yokoyama, J. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac1e31 · Cited by 1,156
Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate
Green, A. M., & Kavanagh, B. J. (2021) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abc534 · Cited by 674
Cosmic microwave background limits on accreting primordial black holes
Ali-Haïmoud, Y., & Kamionkowski, M. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.043534 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Monroy-Rodríguez, M. A., & Allen, C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-07-17
- Volume
- 790
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1971634587
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE END OF THE MACHO ERA, REVISITED: NEW LIMITS ON MACHO MASSES FROM HALO WIDE BINARIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/159
- The paper
- Monroy-Rodríguez, M. A., & Allen, C. (2014). THE END OF THE MACHO ERA, REVISITED: NEW LIMITS ON MACHO MASSES FROM HALO WIDE BINARIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.