The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EXOPLANET POPULATION INFERENCE AND THE ABUNDANCE OF EARTH ANALOGS FROM NOISY, INCOMPLETE CATALOGS
Open accessAbstract
No true extrasolar Earth analog is known. Hundreds of planets have been found around Sun-like stars that are either Earth-sized but on shorter periods, or else on year-long orbits but somewhat larger. Under strong assumptions, exoplanet catalogs have been used to make an extrapolated estimate of the rate at which Sun-like stars host Earth analogs. These studies are complicated by the fact that every catalog is censored by non-trivial selection effects and detection efficiencies, and every property (period, radius, etc.) is measured noisily. Here we present a general hierarchical probabilistic framework for making justified inferences about the population of exoplanets, taking into account survey completeness and, for the first time, observational uncertainties. We are able to make fewer assumptions about the distribution than previous studies; we only require that the occurrence rate density be a smooth function of period and radius (employing a Gaussian process). By applying our method to synthetic catalogs, we demonstrate that it produces more accurate estimates of the whole population than standard procedures based on weighting by inverse detection efficiency. We apply the method to an existing catalog of small planet candidates around G dwarf stars. We confirm a previous result that the radius distribution changes slope near Earth's radius. We find that the rate density of Earth analogs is about 0.02 (per star per natural logarithmic bin in period and radius) with large uncertainty. This number is much smaller than previous estimates made with the same data but stronger assumptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler, III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1202.5852 · Cited by 10
Cited by
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3800 · Cited by 895
The California-Kepler Survey. IV. Metal-rich Stars Host a Greater Diversity of Planets
Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W., Winn, J. N., Weiss, L. M., Fulton, B. J., Howard, A. W., Sinukoff, E., Isaacson, H., Morton, T. D., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa54c · Cited by 363
Self-citationPLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER . VI. PLANET SAMPLE FROM Q1–Q16 (47 MONTHS)
Mullally, F., Coughlin, J. L., Thompson, S. E., Rowe, J., Burke, C., Latham, D. W., Batalha, N. M., Bryson, S. T., Christiansen, J., Henze, C. E., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/31 · Cited by 254
Searching the Entirety of Kepler Data. II. Occurrence Rate Estimates for FGK Stars
Kunimoto, M., & Matthews, J. M. (2020) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab88b0 · Cited by 139
Evidence for Two Hot-Jupiter Formation Paths
Nelson, B. E., Ford, E. B., & Rasio, F. A. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa82b3 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., & Morton, T. D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-10-14
- Volume
- 795
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2051577211
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EXOPLANET POPULATION INFERENCE AND THE ABUNDANCE OF EARTH ANALOGS FROM NOISY, INCOMPLETE CATALOGS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/64
- The paper
- Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., & Morton, T. D. (2014). EXOPLANET POPULATION INFERENCE AND THE ABUNDANCE OF EARTH ANALOGS FROM NOISY, INCOMPLETE CATALOGS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/64
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.