Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LoCuSS: THE SLOW QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION IN CLUSTER GALAXIES AND THE NEED FOR PRE-PROCESSING

Open access
Haines, C. P., Pereira, M. J., Smith, G. P., Egami, E., Babul, A., Finoguenov, A., Ziparo, F., McGee, S. L., Rawle, T. D., Okabe, N., Moran, S. M.·2015·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a study of the spatial distribution and kinematics of star-forming galaxies in 30 massive clusters at 0.15 < z < 0.30, combining wide-field Spitzer 24 μ m and GALEX near-ultraviolet imaging with highly complete spectroscopy of cluster members. The fraction ( f SF ) of star-forming cluster galaxies rises steadily with cluster-centric radius, increasing fivefold by 2 r 200 , but remains well below field values even at 3 r 200 . This suppression of star formation at large radii cannot be reproduced by models in which star formation is quenched in infalling field galaxies only once they pass within r 200 of the cluster, but is consistent with some of them being first pre-processed within galaxy groups. Despite the increasing f SF -radius trend, the surface density of star-forming galaxies actually declines steadily with radius, falling ∼15 × from the core to 2 r 200 . This requires star formation to survive within recently accreted spirals for 2–3 Gyr to build up the apparent over-density of star-forming galaxies within clusters. The velocity dispersion profile of the star-forming galaxy population shows a sharp peak of 1.44 σ ν at 0.3 r 500 , and is 10%–35% higher than that of the inactive cluster members at all cluster-centric radii, while their velocity distribution shows a flat, top-hat profile within r 500 . All of these results are consistent with star-forming cluster galaxies being an infalling population, but one that must also survive ∼0.5–2 Gyr beyond passing within r 200 . By comparing the observed distribution of star-forming galaxies in the stacked caustic diagram with predictions from the Millennium simulation, we obtain a best-fit model in which star formation rates decline exponentially on quenching timescales of 1.73 ± 0.25 Gyr upon accretion into the cluster.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/101

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Haines, C. P., Pereira, M. J., Smith, G. P., Egami, E., Babul, A., Finoguenov, A., Ziparo, F., McGee, S. L., Rawle, T. D., Okabe, N., & Moran, S. M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-06-10
Volume
806
Issue
1
Pages
101
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1864790716
Cited by
259
References
91
FWCI
15.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LoCuSS: THE SLOW QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION IN CLUSTER GALAXIES AND THE NEED FOR PRE-PROCESSING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/101
The paper
Haines, C. P., Pereira, M. J., Smith, G. P., Egami, E., Babul, A., Finoguenov, A., Ziparo, F., McGee, S. L., Rawle, T. D., Okabe, N., & Moran, S. M. (2015). LoCuSS: THE SLOW QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION IN CLUSTER GALAXIES AND THE NEED FOR PRE-PROCESSING. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.