The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE CANNON: A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH TO STELLAR LABEL DETERMINATION
Open accessAbstract
New spectroscopic surveys offer the promise of stellar parameters and abundances ("stellar labels") for hundreds of thousands of stars; this poses a formidable spectral modeling challenge. In many cases, there is a subset of reference objects for which the stellar labels are known with high(er) fidelity. We take advantage of this with The Cannon , a new data-driven approach for determining stellar labels from spectroscopic data. The Cannon learns from the "known" labels of reference stars how the continuum-normalized spectra depend on these labels by fitting a flexible model at each wavelength; then, The Cannon uses this model to derive labels for the remaining survey stars. We illustrate The Cannon by training the model on only 542 stars in 19 clusters as reference objects, with , , and as the labels, and then applying it to the spectra of 55,000 stars from APOGEE DR10. The Cannon is very accurate. Its stellar labels compare well to the stars for which APOGEE pipeline ( ASPCAP ) labels are provided in DR10, with rms differences that are basically identical to the stated ASPCAP uncertainties. Beyond the reference labels, The Cannon makes no use of stellar models nor any line-list, but needs a set of reference objects that span label-space. The Cannon performs well at lower signal-to-noise, as it delivers comparably good labels even at one-ninth the APOGEE observing time. We discuss the limitations of The Cannon and its future potential, particularly, to bring different spectroscopic surveys onto a consistent scale of stellar labels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Cited by
The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic, and Integrated Properties
Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Gerhard, O. (2016) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 · Cited by 1,656
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Bayesian Data Analysis in Astronomy
Sharma, S. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122339 · Cited by 298
Queiroz, A. B. A., Anders, F., Santiago, B. X., Chiappini, C., Steinmetz, M., Dal Ponte, M., Stassun, K. G., da Costa, L. N., Maia, M. A. G., Crestani, J., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty330 · Cited by 234
Spectrophotometric Parallaxes with Linear Models: Accurate Distances for Luminous Red-giant Stars
Hogg, D. W., Eilers, A.-C., & Rix, H.-W. (2019) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab398c · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ness, M., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H.-W., Ho, A. Y. Q., & Zasowski, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2015-07-14
- Volume
- 808
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1663830336
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE CANNON: A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH TO STELLAR LABEL DETERMINATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/808/1/16
- The paper
- Ness, M., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H.-W., Ho, A. Y. Q., & Zasowski, G. (2015). THE CANNON: A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH TO STELLAR LABEL DETERMINATION. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/808/1/16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.