Cited by 55Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsTransition Metal Oxide NanomaterialsAdvanced Materials and Semiconductor Technologies

Characterization of Hafnium Oxide Thin Films Prepared by Electron Beam Evaporation

Al-Kuhaili, M F, Durrani, S M A, Khawaja, E E·2004·Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics

Abstract

Thin films of hafnium oxide were deposited by electron beam evaporation. The effects of the substrate temperature and the oxygen partial pressure on the refractive index and carbon monoxide sensing properties of the films were studied. The films were characterized using x-ray diffraction and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques. Films deposited on unheated substrates were amorphous, whereas those deposited on heated substrates showed a mixture of amorphous and polycrystalline structure. All the films were found to be optically inhomogeneous. The inhomogeneity of the films was taken into account in the determination of their refractive indices. It was found that the porosity (as reflected by the refractive indices) of the films was the main factor that affected the sensitivity of the films in relation to their detection of carbon monoxide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0022-3727/37/8/015

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HfO2 has a high refractive index, wide transparency from the UV to mid-IR region (bandgap larger than 5.5 eV), and significant thermal and chemical stability.

    “Its high refractive index, wide transparency from UV to mid-IR region (due to its bandgap, which is larger than 5.5 eV [64]) and significant thermal and chemical stability [65] propelled HfO2 for the manufacture of antireflective coatings [66] and highly reflective mirrors [67], but also in other applications, such as memory devices [68], among others [69,70].”

    From Metal Oxide Thin Films for Advanced Photonic Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Kuhaili, M. F., Durrani, S. M. A., & Khawaja, E. E.
Affiliations
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Venue
Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
Published
2004-03-31
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
1254-1261
ISSN
  • 0022-3727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6463
OpenAlex
W2077926730
Cited by
55
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Physics D Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
Funders
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Materials and Semiconductor Technologies
Keywords
hafnium oxide thin films, electron beam evaporation, substrate temperature, oxygen partial pressure, refractive index, carbon monoxide detection, gas sensors, film porosity, optical inhomogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review