Cited by 113Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A mathematical model for the atomic clock error

Open access

Abstract

A mathematical model for the clock phase and frequency deviation based on the theory of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) is discussed. In particular, we consider a model that includes what are called the `white and random walk frequency noises' in time metrology, which give rise in a mathematical context to a Wiener and an integrated Wiener process on the clock phase. Due to the particular simple expression of the functions involved an exact solution exists, and we determine it by considering the model in a wider theoretical context, which is suitable for generalizations to more complex instances. Moreover, we determine an iterative form for the solution, useful for simulation and further processing of clock data, such as filtering and prediction. The Euler method, generally applied in literature to approximate the solution of SDEs, is examined and compared to the exact solution, and the magnitude of the approximation is evaluated. The possible extension of the model to other noise sources, such as the flicker and white phase noises, is also sketched.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0026-1394/40/3/305

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Galleani, L., Sacerdote, L., Tavella, P., & Zucca, C.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Venue
Metrologia
Published
2003-06
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
S257-S264
ISSN
  • 0026-1394 (ISSN-L)
  • 1681-7575
OpenAlex
W2047239488
Cited by
113
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Metrologia (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (IRIS Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica) (submittedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Time Synchronization Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Keywords
frequency deviation, stochastic differential equations, white noise, Brownian motion, exact solutions, Euler method, 1/f noise, white phase noise, time metrology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review