The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy
Abstract
Our method for predicting, and compensating for, the effects of surface irregularities and tissue heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy was evaluated by comparing the predicted and measured dose distributions. Two heterogeneity configurations in a D-shaped water-filled phantom were handled in exactly the same way as patients. Target volumes were designated on thin-section CT scans, a single en face portal was defined, compensating boli were designed and made, and the dose distribution behind the phantom measured and compared with that intended. The compensation was accurate to within 1 mm for the phantom with a single air heterogeneity and to within 2.5 mm for the phantom with multiple bone and air heterogeneities. The bolus and phantom were misaligned by 3 mm and the dramatic change in the dose distribution demonstrated the need to address the problems of patient motion and imperfect immobilisation through compensator design. A philosophy of 'expanding' the bolus is described, and dose distributions measured with the 'expanded' boli indicate that target volume treatment can be assured within prespecified repositioning and motion uncertainties. The uncertainty in the alignment of bolus and heterogeneities leads to corresponding uncertainty in the penetration of the protons. Ranges within which they will stop are calculated and shown to encompass adequately the measured distributions in both the aligned and misaligned cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Method for Correcting Bone Induced Artifacts in Computed Tomography Scanners
Joseph, P. M., & Spital, R. D. (1978) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-197801000-00017 · Cited by 281
Cited by
Proton therapy – Present and future
Mohan, R., & Grosshans, D. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.006 · Cited by 608
Austin-Seymour, M., Munzenrider, J., Goitein, M., Verhey, L., Urie, M., Gentry, R., Birnbaum, S., Ruotolo, D., McManus, P., Skates, S., et al. (1989) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1989.70.1.0013 · Cited by 306
Self-citationProton vs carbon ion beams in the definitive radiation treatment of cancer patients
Suit, H., DeLaney, T., Goldberg, S., Paganetti, H., Clasie, B., Gerweck, L., Niemierko, A., Hall, E., Flanz, J., Hallman, J., et al. (2010) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.015 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Urie, M., Goitein, M., & Wagner, M.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1984-05-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 553-566
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2018120900
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/29/5/008
- The paper
- Urie, M., Goitein, M., & Wagner, M. (1984). Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/29/5/008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.