The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proton vs carbon ion beams in the definitive radiation treatment of cancer patients
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiobiology for the Radiologist.
(1974) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-80-3-438_1 · Cited by 3,484
The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy
Fowler, J. F. (1989) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/0007-1285-62-740-679 · Cited by 2,252
Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology
Perez, C., & Brady, L. (1999) · Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology · doi:10.1097/00043426-199911000-00025 · Cited by 1,871
Timmerman, R., McGarry, R., Yiannoutsos, C., Papiez, L., Tudor, K., DeLuca, J., Ewing, M., Abdulrahman, R., DesRosiers, C., Williams, M., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.5937 · Cited by 1,556
Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy
Paganetti, H., Niemierko, A., Ancukiewicz, M., Gerweck, L. E., Goitein, M., Loeffler, J. S., & Suit, H. D. (2002) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02754-2 · Cited by 1,364
Self-citationZietman, A. L., DeSilvio, M. L., Slater, J. D., Rossi, C. J., Miller, D. W., Adams, J. A., & Shipley, W. U. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.10.1233 · Cited by 1,224
Preston, D. L., Shimizu, Y., Pierce, D. A., Suyama, A., & Mabuchi, K. (2003) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3049 · Cited by 1,172
Joiner, M. C., & van der Kogel, A. (2009) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b15450 · Cited by 1,068
Nordsmark, M., Bentzen, S. M., Rudat, V., Brizel, D., Lartigau, E., Stadler, P., Becker, A., Adam, M., Molls, M., Dunst, J., et al. (2005) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.038 · Cited by 953
Biophysical characteristics of HIMAC clinical irradiation system for heavy-ion radiation therapy
Kanai, T., Endo, M., Minohara, S., Miyahara, N., Koyama-ito, H., Tomura, H., Matsufuji, N., Futami, Y., Fukumura, A., Hiraoka, T., et al. (1999) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00544-6 · Cited by 889
Cited by
Past, present, and future of radiotherapy for the benefit of patients
Thariat, J., Hannoun-Levi, J.-M., Sun Myint, A., Vuong, T., & Gérard, J.-P. (2013) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.203 · Cited by 455
Antonovic, L., Brahme, A., Furusawa, Y., & Toma-Dasu, I. (2013) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1093/jrr/rrs070 · Cited by 60
In vivo validation of the BIANCA biophysical model: benchmarking against rat spinal cord RBE data
Carante, M. P., Aricò, G., Ferrari, A., Karger, C. P., Kozlowska, W., Mairani, A., Sala, P., & Ballarini, F. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21113973 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Suit, H., DeLaney, T., Goldberg, S., Paganetti, H., Clasie, B., Gerweck, L., Niemierko, A., Hall, E., Flanz, J., Hallman, J., & Trofimov, A.
- Venue
- Radiotherapy and Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-22
- ISSN
- 0167-8140 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042499995
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proton vs carbon ion beams in the definitive radiation treatment of cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.015
- The paper
- Suit, H., DeLaney, T., Goldberg, S., Paganetti, H., Clasie, B., Gerweck, L., Niemierko, A., Hall, E., Flanz, J., Hallman, J., & Trofimov, A. (2010). Proton vs carbon ion beams in the definitive radiation treatment of cancer patients. Radiotherapy and Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
