The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone
Abstract
Three-dimensional structure is one of the main factors influencing the mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. To analyse the trabecular bone structure non-destructively we used a peripheral QCT system and applied a special thin-slice technique to create high-resolution volumetric data sets serving as a basis for something we would like to call non-invasive bone biopsy. In order to obtain binary data sets, the mineralized bone in the CT volume was separated from bone marrow and muscle tissue with the help of a sophisticated three-dimensional segmentation algorithm based on the analysis of directional derivatives, which are computed from a locally approximated fit function of the original CT volume. Binary volumes including either a solid representation of trabecular plates and rods or a topological representation of the cancellous bone architecture were acquired. Such volumes can be processed non-destructively and, even more important, repetitively. By using a surface reconstruction algorithm based on interpolating triangulation it was possible to visualize the three-dimensional surface of the trabecular bone structure. The results showed that surface representation and visualization in combination with a multiple thin-slice measuring technique are valuable tools in studying three-dimensional bone architecture. In the future, the non-invasive bone biopsies will be evaluated by means of three-dimensional mechanical analysis incorporating finite element modelling and direct morphological investigations of the cancellous bone architecture for a better prediction of bone strength as an index for fracture risk or osteoporosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Cited by
Hildebrand, T., Laib, A., Müller, R., Dequeker, J., & Rüegsegger, P. (1999) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1167 · Cited by 1,303
Self-citationQuantification of Bone Microarchitecture with the Structure Model Index
HILDEBRAND, T., & RÜEGSEGGER, P. (1997) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/01495739708936692 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationKhosla, S., Amin, S., & Orwoll, E. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2008-0002 · Cited by 930
A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture
Rüegsegger, P., Koller, B., & Müller, R. (1996) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02509542 · Cited by 893
Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices
Lutolf, M. P., Weber, F. E., Schmoekel, H. G., Schense, J. C., Kohler, T., Müller, R., & Hubbell, J. A. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt818 · Cited by 850
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Muller, R., Hildebrand, T., & Ruegsegger, P.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-164
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2052773841
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/39/1/009
- The paper
- Muller, R., Hildebrand, T., & Ruegsegger, P. (1994). Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/39/1/009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.