The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG
Open accessAbstract
The spherical head model has been used in magnetoencephalography (MEG) as a simple forward model for calculating the external magnetic fields resulting from neural activity. For more realistic head shapes, the boundary element method (BEM) or similar numerical methods are used, but at greatly increased computational cost. We introduce a sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere (OS) head model for rapid calculation of more realistic head shapes. The volume currents associated with primary neural activity are used to fit spherical head models for each individual MEG sensor such that the head is more realistically modelled as a set of overlapping spheres, rather than a single sphere. To assist in the evaluation of this OS model with BEM and other head models, we also introduce a novel comparison technique that is based on a generalized eigenvalue decomposition and accounts for the presence of noise in the MEG data. With this technique we can examine the worst possible errors for thousands of dipole locations in a realistic brain volume. We test the traditional single-sphere model, three-shell and single-shell BEM, and the new OS model. The results show that the OS model has accuracy similar to the BEM but is orders of magnitude faster to compute.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data
Hamalainen, M. S., & Sarvas, J. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.16463 · Cited by 989
Cited by
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2011/156869 · Cited by 10,323
Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink
Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1549 · Cited by 888
Brain Dynamics Underlying the Nonlinear Threshold for Access to Consciousness
Del Cul, A., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050260 · Cited by 753
Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., Edden, R. A. E., Jones, D. K., Swettenham, J. B., & Singh, K. D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900728106 · Cited by 567
Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI
Brookes, M. J., Hale, J. R., Zumer, J. M., Stevenson, C. M., Francis, S. T., Barnes, G. R., Owen, J. P., Morris, P. G., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.054 · Cited by 519
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, M. X., Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 423-440
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W1989045420
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/010
- The paper
- Huang, M. X., Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M. (1999). A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.