Cited by 989EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data

Hamalainen, M.S., Sarvas, J.·1989·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

In this paper, the computational and practical aspects of a realistically-shaped multilayer model for the conductivity geometry of the human head are discussed. A novel way to handle the numerical difficulties caused by the presence of the poorly conducting skull is presented. Using our method, both the potential on the surface of the head and the magnetic field outside the head can be computed accurately. The procedure was tested with the multilayer sphere model, for which analytical expressions are available. The method is then applied to a realistically-shaped head model, and it is numerically shown that for the computation of B, produced by cerebral current sources, it is sufficient to consider a brain-shaped homogeneous conductor only since the secondary currents on the outer interfaces give only a negligible contribution to the magnetic field outside the head. Comparisons with the sphere model are also included to pinpoint areas where the homogeneous conductor model provides essential improvements in the calculation of the magnetic field outside the head.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/10.16463

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the late 1980s, the boundary element method has been most widely used for anatomically constrained electrophysiological source imaging with EEG/MEG.

    “Since the introduction to brain source imaging in late 1980s (13, 14), the BEM has been most widely used for anatomically constrained ESI with EEG/MEG.”
  • For realistic-geometry head models, numeric solutions are attainable with the boundary element method assuming isotropic conductivity or the finite element method assuming anisotropic conductivity.

    “For realistic-geometry head models, numeric solutions are attainable with either the boundary element method (BEM) by assuming isotropic conductivity (13, 14) or the finite element method (FEM) models by assuming anisotropic conductivity (15).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamalainen, M. S., & Sarvas, J.
Affiliations
Aalto University (FI)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
1989-02
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
165-171
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W1968697559
Cited by
989
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 45
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
magnetic field calculation, skull conductivity, secondary currents, scalp potentials
MeSH terms
Brain, Electric Conductivity, Electromagnetic Fields, Head, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Models, Biological, Electromagnetic Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review