The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resting GABA concentration predicts peak gamma frequency and fMRI amplitude in response to visual stimulation in humans
Open accessAbstract
Functional imaging of the human brain is an increasingly important technique for clinical and cognitive neuroscience research, with functional MRI (fMRI) of the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response and electroencephalography or magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings of neural oscillations being 2 of the most popular approaches. However, the neural and physiological mechanisms that generate these responses are only partially understood and sources of interparticipant variability in these measures are rarely investigated. Here, we test the hypothesis that the properties of these neuroimaging metrics are related to individual levels of cortical inhibition by combining magnetic resonance spectroscopy to quantify resting GABA concentration in the visual cortex, MEG to measure stimulus-induced visual gamma oscillations and fMRI to measure the BOLD response to a simple visual grating stimulus. Our results demonstrate that across individuals gamma oscillation frequency is positively correlated with resting GABA concentration in visual cortex (R = 0.68; P < 0.02), BOLD magnitude is inversely correlated with resting GABA (R = −0.64; P < 0.05) and that gamma oscillation frequency is strongly inversely correlated with the magnitude of the BOLD response (R = −0.88; P < 0.001). Our results are therefore supportive of recent theories suggesting that these functional neuroimaging metrics are dependent on the excitation/inhibition balance in an individual's cortex and have important implications for the interpretation of functional imaging results, particularly when making between-group comparisons in clinical research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888
Cortical Surface-Based Analysis
Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., & Sereno, M. I. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 · Cited by 10,910
Fast robust automated brain extraction
Smith, S. M. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 · Cited by 10,496
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI
Logothetis, N. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06976 · Cited by 3,612
Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex
Gray, C. M., & Singer, W. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.5.1698 · Cited by 2,463
Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia
Lewis, D. A., Hashimoto, T., & Volk, D. W. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1648 · Cited by 2,297
Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields
Ogawa, S., Lee, T., Nayak, A. S., & Glynn, P. (1990) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910140108 · Cited by 2,266
Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks
Bartos, M., Vida, I., & Jonas, P. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2044 · Cited by 2,070
Whittington, M. A., Traub, R. D., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373612a0 · Cited by 1,613
Cited by
Control of sleep and wakefulness
Brown, R. E., Basheer, R., McKenna, J. T., Strecker, R. E., & McCarley, R. W. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2011 · Cited by 1,477
The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition
Kanai, R., & Rees, G. (2011) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3000 · Cited by 1,055
High-Frequency Brain Activity and Muscle Artifacts in MEG/EEG: A Review and Recommendations
Muthukumaraswamy, S. D. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00138 · Cited by 697
Self-citationAttentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas
Bosman, C. A., Schoffelen, J.-M., Brunet, N., Oostenveld, R., Bastos, A. M., Womelsdorf, T., Rubehn, B., Stieglitz, T., De Weerd, P., & Fries, P. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.037 · Cited by 720
Biophysical and Physiological Origins of Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent fMRI Signals
Kim, S.-G., & Ogawa, S. (2012) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.23 · Cited by 547
Metadata
- Authors
- Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., Edden, R. A. E., Jones, D. K., Swettenham, J. B., & Singh, K. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-05-19
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8356-8361
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2030825382
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 28.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resting GABA concentration predicts peak gamma frequency and fMRI amplitude in response to visual stimulation in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0900728106
- The paper
- Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., Edden, R. A. E., Jones, D. K., Swettenham, J. B., & Singh, K. D. (2009). Resting GABA concentration predicts peak gamma frequency and fMRI amplitude in response to visual stimulation in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900728106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.