The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom
Open accessAbstract
We used a real-skull phantom head to investigate the performances of representative methods for EEG source localization when considering various head models. We describe several experiments using a montage with current sources located at multiple positions and orientations inside a human skull filled with a conductive medium. The robustness of selected methods based on distributed source models is evaluated as various solutions to the forward problem (from the sphere to the finite element method) are considered. Experimental results indicate that inverse methods using appropriate cortex-based source models are almost always able to locate the active source with excellent precision, with little or no spurious activity in close or distant regions, even when two sources are simultaneously active. Superior regularization schemes for solving the inverse problem can dramatically help the estimation of sparse and focal active zones, despite significant approximation of the head geometry and the conductivity properties of the head tissues. Realistic head models are necessary, though, to fit the data with a reasonable level of residual variance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC
Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.740118 · Cited by 398
Cited by
Magnetoencephalography for Brain Electrophysiology and Imaging
Baillet, S. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4504 · Cited by 992
Self-citationMEG: An Introduction to Methods
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307238.001.0001 · Cited by 408
Functional coupling of simultaneous electrical and metabolic activity in the human brain
Oakes, T. R., Pizzagalli, D. A., Hendrick, A. M., Horras, K. A., Larson, C. L., Abercrombie, H. C., Schaefer, S. M., Koger, J. V., & Davidson, R. J. (2004) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20004 · Cited by 235
Spatially sparse source cluster modeling by compressive neuromagnetic tomography
Chang, W.-T., Nummenmaa, A., Hsieh, J.-C., & Lin, F.-H. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.013 · Cited by 52
Atypical auditory language processing in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder
Tanigawa, J., Kagitani-Shimono, K., Matsuzaki, J., Ogawa, R., Hanaie, R., Yamamoto, T., Tominaga, K., Nabatame, S., Mohri, I., Taniike, M., et al. (2018) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2018.05.014 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Baillet, S., Riera, J. J., Marin, G., Mangin, J. F., Aubert, J., & Garnero, L.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2000-11-30
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-96
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2066937230
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/46/1/306
- The paper
- Baillet, S., Riera, J. J., Marin, G., Mangin, J. F., Aubert, J., & Garnero, L. (2001). Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/46/1/306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.