Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 801

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon-counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography

Open access
Schlomka, J P, Roessl, E, Dorscheid, R, Dill, S, Martens, G, Istel, T, Bäumer, C, Herrmann, C, Steadman, R, Zeitler, G, Livne, A, Proksa, R·2008·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Theoretical considerations predicted the feasibility of K-edge x-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging using energy discriminating detectors with more than two energy bins. This technique enables material-specific imaging in CT, which in combination with high-Z element based contrast agents, opens up possibilities for new medical applications. In this paper, we present a CT system with energy detection capabilities, which was used to demonstrate the feasibility of quantitative K-edge CT imaging experimentally. A phantom was imaged containing PMMA, calcium-hydroxyapatite, water and two contrast agents based on iodine and gadolinium, respectively. Separate images of the attenuation by photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering were reconstructed from energy-resolved projection data using maximum-likelihood basis-component decomposition. The data analysis further enabled the display of images of the individual contrast agents and their concentrations, separated from the anatomical background. Measured concentrations of iodine and gadolinium were in good agreement with the actual concentrations. Prior to the tomographic measurements, the detector response functions for monochromatic illumination using synchrotron radiation were determined in the energy range 25 keV-60 keV. These data were used to calibrate the detector and derive a phenomenological model for the detector response and the energy bin sensitivities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/53/15/002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 801

Metadata

Authors
Schlomka, J. P., Roessl, E., Dorscheid, R., Dill, S., Martens, G., Istel, T., Bäumer, C., Herrmann, C., Steadman, R., Zeitler, G., Livne, A., & Proksa, R.
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2008-07-08
Volume
53
Issue
15
Pages
4031-4047
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W1981418870
Cited by
801
References
2
FWCI
18.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon-counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/53/15/002
The paper
Schlomka, J. P., Roessl, E., Dorscheid, R., Dill, S., Martens, G., Istel, T., Bäumer, C., Herrmann, C., Steadman, R., Zeitler, G., Livne, A., & Proksa, R. (2008). Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon-counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/15/002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.