The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering
Open accessAbstract
Microbubble contrast agents and the associated imaging systems have developed over the past 25 years, originating with manually-agitated fluids introduced for intra-coronary injection. Over this period, stabilizing shells and low diffusivity gas materials have been incorporated in microbubbles, extending stability in vitro and in vivo. Simultaneously, the interaction of these small gas bubbles with ultrasonic waves has been extensively studied, resulting in models for oscillation and increasingly sophisticated imaging strategies. Early studies recognized that echoes from microbubbles contained frequencies that are multiples of the microbubble resonance frequency. Although individual microbubble contrast agents cannot be resolved-given that their diameter is on the order of microns-nonlinear echoes from these agents are used to map regions of perfused tissue and to estimate the local microvascular flow rate. Such strategies overcome a fundamental limitation of previous ultrasound blood flow strategies; the previous Doppler-based strategies are insensitive to capillary flow. Further, the insonation of resonant bubbles results in interesting physical phenomena that have been widely studied for use in drug and gene delivery. Ultrasound pressure can enhance gas diffusion, rapidly fragment the agent into a set of smaller bubbles or displace the microbubble to a blood vessel wall. Insonation of a microbubble can also produce liquid jets and local shear stress that alter biological membranes and facilitate transport. In this review, we focus on the physical aspects of these agents, exploring microbubble imaging modes, models for microbubble oscillation and the interaction of the microbubble with the endothelium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Martin, H., Jolesz, F. A., & Vykhodtseva, N. (2003) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00741-x · Cited by 144
Choi, J. J., Pernot, M., Brown, T. R., Small, S. A., & Konofagou, E. E. (2007) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/18/004 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Sonochemical synthesis of nanomaterials
Xu, H., Zeiger, B. W., & Suslick, K. S. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35282f · Cited by 1,161
Blood Vessel Deformations on Microsecond Time Scales by Ultrasonic Cavitation
Chen, H., Kreider, W., Brayman, A. A., Bailey, M. R., & Matula, T. J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.034301 · Cited by 314
Targeted Nanotheranostics for Future Personalized Medicine: Recent Progress in Cancer Therapy
Jo, S. D., Ku, S. H., Won, Y.-Y., Kim, S. H., & Kwon, I. C. (2016) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.15335 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, S., Caskey, C. F., & Ferrara, K. W.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-02-19
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- R27-R57
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2050370670
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/r01
- The paper
- Qin, S., Caskey, C. F., & Ferrara, K. W. (2009). Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/r01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.