Cited by 21Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Registration of 2D x-ray images to 3D MRI by generating pseudo-CT data

van der Bom, M J, Pluim, J P W, Gounis, M J, van de Kraats, E B, Sprinkhuizen, S M, Timmer, J, Homan, R, Bartels, L W·2011·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Spatial and soft tissue information provided by magnetic resonance imaging can be very valuable during image-guided procedures, where usually only real-time two-dimensional (2D) x-ray images are available. Registration of 2D x-ray images to three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, acquired prior to the procedure, can provide optimal information to guide the procedure. However, registering x-ray images to MRI data is not a trivial task because of their fundamental difference in tissue contrast. This paper presents a technique that generates pseudo-computed tomography (CT) data from multi-spectral MRI acquisitions which is sufficiently similar to real CT data to enable registration of x-ray to MRI with comparable accuracy as registration of x-ray to CT. The method is based on a k-nearest-neighbors (kNN)-regression strategy which labels voxels of MRI data with CT Hounsfield Units. The regression method uses multi-spectral MRI intensities and intensity gradients as features to discriminate between various tissue types. The efficacy of using pseudo-CT data for registration of x-ray to MRI was tested on ex vivo animal data. 2D-3D registration experiments using CT and pseudo-CT data of multiple subjects were performed with a commonly used 2D-3D registration algorithm. On average, the median target registration error for registration of two x-ray images to MRI data was approximately 1 mm larger than for x-ray to CT registration. The authors have shown that pseudo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/56/4/010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct automatic registration between MRI volumes and 2D radiography such as X-rays and C-arm fluoroscopy is challenging because differences in imaging physics and contrast mechanisms lead to varying tissue contrasts.

    “Nevertheless, direct automatic registration between MRI volumes and 2D radiography such as X-rays and C-arm fluoroscopy has been a challenging task, as the differences in their imaging physics and contrast mechanisms lead to varying tissue contrasts (van der Bom et al. 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Bom, M. J., Pluim, J. P. W., Gounis, M. J., van de Kraats, E. B., Sprinkhuizen, S. M., Timmer, J., Homan, R., & Bartels, L. W.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Philips (Netherlands) (NL)
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2011-01-21
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
1031-1043
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W2077981636
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
2D-3D registration, X-ray images, magnetic resonance imaging, pseudo-CT generation, multispectral MRI, k-nearest neighbors regression, image-guided interventions, tissue contrast, intensity gradient, target registration error
MeSH terms
Animals, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review