Registration of 2D x-ray images to 3D MRI by generating pseudo-CT data
Abstract
Spatial and soft tissue information provided by magnetic resonance imaging can be very valuable during image-guided procedures, where usually only real-time two-dimensional (2D) x-ray images are available. Registration of 2D x-ray images to three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, acquired prior to the procedure, can provide optimal information to guide the procedure. However, registering x-ray images to MRI data is not a trivial task because of their fundamental difference in tissue contrast. This paper presents a technique that generates pseudo-computed tomography (CT) data from multi-spectral MRI acquisitions which is sufficiently similar to real CT data to enable registration of x-ray to MRI with comparable accuracy as registration of x-ray to CT. The method is based on a k-nearest-neighbors (kNN)-regression strategy which labels voxels of MRI data with CT Hounsfield Units. The regression method uses multi-spectral MRI intensities and intensity gradients as features to discriminate between various tissue types. The efficacy of using pseudo-CT data for registration of x-ray to MRI was tested on ex vivo animal data. 2D-3D registration experiments using CT and pseudo-CT data of multiple subjects were performed with a commonly used 2D-3D registration algorithm. On average, the median target registration error for registration of two x-ray images to MRI data was approximately 1 mm larger than for x-ray to CT registration. The authors have shown that pseudo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Direct automatic registration between MRI volumes and 2D radiography such as X-rays and C-arm fluoroscopy is challenging because differences in imaging physics and contrast mechanisms lead to varying tissue contrasts.
“Nevertheless, direct automatic registration between MRI volumes and 2D radiography such as X-rays and C-arm fluoroscopy has been a challenging task, as the differences in their imaging physics and contrast mechanisms lead to varying tissue contrasts (van der Bom et al. 2011).”
From Towards 2D/3D Registration of the Preoperative MRI to Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Images for Visualisation of Bone Defects (2023) · cites this paper as van der Bom et al. 2011
Cites
A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition
Devroye, L., Györfi, L., & Lugosi, G. (1996) · Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0711-5 · Cited by 3,274 · see citing works
Hill, D. L. G., Batchelor, P. G., Holden, M., & Hawkes, D. J. (2001) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201 · Cited by 2,093 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ku, P.-C., Martin-Gomez, A., Gao, C., Grupp, R., Mears, S. C., & Armand, M. (2023) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2022.2152375 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- van der Bom, M. J., Pluim, J. P. W., Gounis, M. J., van de Kraats, E. B., Sprinkhuizen, S. M., Timmer, J., Homan, R., & Bartels, L. W.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Philips (Netherlands) (NL)
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2011-01-21
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1031-1043
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2077981636
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- 2D-3D registration, X-ray images, magnetic resonance imaging, pseudo-CT generation, multispectral MRI, k-nearest neighbors regression, image-guided interventions, tissue contrast, intensity gradient, target registration error
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review