Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

YOUNG STELLAR OBJECTS IN THE GOULD BELT

Open access
Dunham, Michael M., Allen, Lori E., Evans II, Neal J., Broekhoven-Fiene, Hannah, Cieza, Lucas A., Di Francesco, James, Gutermuth, Robert A., Harvey, Paul M., Hatchell, Jennifer, Heiderman, Amanda, Huard, Tracy L., Johnstone, Doug, Kirk, Jason M., Matthews, Brenda C., Miller, Jennifer F., Peterson, Dawn E., Young, Kaisa E.·2015·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
DOI 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We present the full catalog of Young Stellar Objects (YSOs) identified in the 18 molecular clouds surveyed by the Spitzer Space Telescope "cores to disks" (c2d) and "Gould Belt" (GB) Legacy surveys. Using standard techniques developed by the c2d project, we identify 3239 candidate YSOs in the 18 clouds, 2966 of which survive visual inspection and form our final catalog of YSOs in the GB. We compile extinction corrected spectral energy distributions for all 2966 YSOs and calculate and tabulate the infrared spectral index, bolometric luminosity, and bolometric temperature for each object. We find that 326 (11%), 210 (7%), 1248 (42%), and 1182 (40%) are classified as Class 0 + I, Flat-spectrum, Class II, and Class III, respectively, and show that the Class III sample suffers from an overall contamination rate by background Asymptotic Giant Branch stars between 25% and 90%. Adopting standard assumptions, we derive durations of 0.40–0.78 Myr for Class 0 + I YSOs and 0.26–0.50 Myr for Flat-spectrum YSOs, where the ranges encompass uncertainties in the adopted assumptions. Including information from (sub)millimeter wavelengths, one-third of the Class 0 + I sample is classified as Class 0, leading to durations of 0.13–0.26 Myr (Class 0) and 0.27–0.52 Myr (Class I). We revisit infrared color–color diagrams used in the literature to classify YSOs and propose minor revisions to classification boundaries in these diagrams. Finally, we show that the bolometric temperature is a poor discriminator between Class II and Class III YSOs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Dunham, M. M., Allen, L. E., Evans II, N. J., Broekhoven-Fiene, H., Cieza, L. A., Di Francesco, J., Gutermuth, R. A., Harvey, P. M., Hatchell, J., Heiderman, A., Huard, T. L., Johnstone, D., Kirk, J. M., Matthews, B. C., Miller, J. F., Peterson, D. E., & Young, K. E.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Publisher
American Astronomical Society
Published
2015-09-09
Volume
220
Issue
1
Pages
11
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
DOI
10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11
OpenAlex
W1803034617
Cited by
303
References
64
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: YOUNG STELLAR OBJECTS IN THE GOULD BELT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11
The paper
Dunham, M. M., Allen, L. E., Evans II, N. J., Broekhoven-Fiene, H., Cieza, L. A., Di Francesco, J., Gutermuth, R. A., Harvey, P. M., Hatchell, J., Heiderman, A., Huard, T. L., Johnstone, D., Kirk, J. M., Matthews, B. C., Miller, J. F., Peterson, D. E., & Young, K. E. (2015). YOUNG STELLAR OBJECTS IN THE GOULD BELT. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.