Cited by 114Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Towards the QFT on curved spacetime limit of QGR: II. A concrete implementation

Open access
Sahlmann, H, Thiemann, T·2006·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

The present paper is the companion of Sahlmann and Thiemann ( 2006 Towards the QFT on curved spacetime limit of QGR: I. A general scheme Class. Quantum Grav. 23 867 ) in which we proposed a scheme that tries to derive the quantum field theory (QFT) on curved spacetimes (CST) limit from background-independent quantum general relativity (QGR). The constructions of the companion paper make heavy use of the notion of semiclassical states for QGR . In the present paper, we employ the complexifier coherent states for QGR recently proposed by Thiemann and Winkler as semiclassical states, and thus fill the general formulae obtained in the companion paper with life. We demonstrate how one can, under some simplifying assumptions, explicitly compute expectation values of the operators relevant for the gravity–matter Hamiltonians of the companion paper in the complexifier coherent states. These expectation values give rise to effective matter Hamiltonians on the background on which the gravitational coherent state is peaked and thus induce approximate notions of n -particle states and matter propagation on fluctuating spacetimes. We display the details for the scalar and the electromagnetic field. The effective theories exhibit two types of corrections as compared to the ordinary QFT on CST. The first is due to the quantum fluctuations of the gravitational field and the second arises from the fact that background independence forces both geometry and matter to propagate on a spacetime of the form , where γ is a (random) graph. Finally, we obtain explicit numerical predictions for non-standard dispersion relations for the scalar and the electromagnetic field. They should, however, not be taken too seriously, due to the many ambiguities in our scheme, the analysis of the physical significance of which has only begun. We show, however, that one can classify these ambiguities at least in broad terms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/23/3/020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early model calculations suggest that Lorentz-invariance-violation effects may arise from a quantum-gravity granularity of spacetime measured at rest by a preferred frame.

    “In the absence of detailed formulations, certain early pioneering model calculations [192] (see also general treatment [340, 341]) indicate the possibility for certain Lorentz-invariance-violation (LIV) effects associated to a quantum-gravity granularity of spacetime measured at rest by a preferred frame of observers.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [341]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 114

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Sahlmann H and Thiemann T 2006 Towards the QFT on curved spacetime limit of QGR: I. A general scheme Class. Quantum Grav. 23 867 (Preprint gr-qc/0207030) · arXiv
  2. Rovelli C 1998 Loop quantum gravity Living Rev. Rel. 1 1 (Preprint gr-qc/9710008) · arXiv
  3. Rovelli C 2000 The century of the incomplete revolution: searching for general relativistic quantum field theory J. Math. Phys. 41 3776-800 (Preprint hep-th/9910131) · DOI
  4. Ashtekar A, Rovelli C and Smolin L 1992 Weaving a classical geometry with quantum threads Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 237-40 (Preprint hep-th/9203079) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bombelli L 2001 Statistical geometry of random weave states Preprint gr-qc/0101080 · arXiv
  6. Thiemann T 2001 Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS): I. General properties Class. Quantum Grav. 18 2025-64 (Preprint hep-th/0005233) · DOI
  7. Thiemann T and Winkler O 2001 Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS): II. Peakedness properties Class. Quantum Grav. 18 2561-636 (Preprint hep-th/0005237) · DOI
  8. Thiemann T and Winkler O 2001 Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS): III. Ehrenfest theorems Class. Quantum Grav. 18 4629-82 (Preprint hep-th/0005234) · DOI
  9. Iwasaki J and Rovelli C 1994 Gravitons from loops: nonperturbative loop space quantum gravity contains the graviton physics approximation Class. Quantum Grav. 11 1653-76 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ashtekar A, Rovelli C and Smolin L 1991 Gravitons and loops Phys. Rev. D 44 1740-55 (Preprint hep-th/9202054) · DOI
  11. Varadarajan M 2002 Gravitons from a loop representation of linearized gravity Preprint gr-qc/0204067 · arXiv
  12. Varadarajan M 2001 Photons from quantized electric flux representations Phys. Rev. D 64 104003 (Preprint gr-qc/0104051) · DOI
  13. Varadarajan M 2000 Fock representations from U(1) holonomy algebras Phys. Rev. D 61 104001 (Preprint gr-qc/0001050) · DOI
  14. Ashtekar A and Lewandowski J 2001 Relation between polymer and Fock excitations Class. Quantum Grav. 18 L117-28 (Preprint gr-qc/0107043) · DOI
  15. Sahlmann H, Thiemann T and Winkler O 2001 Coherent states for canonical quantum general relativity and the infinite tensor product extension Nucl. Phys. B 606 401-40 (Preprint gr-qc/0102038) · DOI
  16. Thiemann T 2002 Complexifier coherent states for quantum general relativity Preprint gr-qc/0206037 · arXiv
  17. Rovelli C 1991 What is observable in classical and quantum gravity? Class. Quantum Grav. 8 297-316 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Rovelli C 1991 Quantum reference systems Class. Quantum Grav. 8 317-32 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Thiemann T 1998 QSD: V. Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of matter quantum field theories Class. Quantum Grav. 15 1281-314 (Preprint gr-qc/9705019) · DOI · Paper page
  20. Alfaro J, Morales-Tecotl H A and Urrutia L F 2000 Quantum gravity corrections to neutrino propagation Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2318-21 (Preprint gr-qc/9909079) · DOI
  21. Alfaro J, Morales-Tecotl H A and Urrutia L F 2001 Loop quantum gravity and light propagation Preprint hep-th/0108061 · arXiv
  22. Alfaro J and Palma G 2001 Loop quantum gravity corrections and cosmic rays decays Preprint hep-th/0111176 · arXiv
  23. Christ N H, Friedberg R and Lee T D 1982 Random lattice field theory: general formulation Nucl. Phys. B 202 89 · DOI
  24. Christ N H, Friedberg R and Lee T D 1982 Gauge theory on a random lattice Nucl. Phys. B 210 310 · DOI
  25. Christ N H, Friedberg R and Lee T D 1982 Weights of links and plaquettes in a random lattice Nucl. Phys. B 210 337 · DOI
  26. Tanguy A, Wittmer J P, Leonforte F and Barrat J-L 2002 Continuum limit of amorphous elastic bodies: a finite-size study of low frequency harmonic vibrations Preprint cond-mat/0204258 · arXiv
  27. Hall B 1994 The Segal-Bargmann 'coherent state' transform for compact Lie groups J. Funct. Anal. 122 103-51 · DOI
  28. Hall B 1997 Phase space bounds for quantum mechanics on a compact Lie group Commun. Math. Phys. 184 233-50 · DOI
  29. Thiemann T 2001 Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): VII. Symplectic structures and continuum lattice formulations of gauge field theories Class. Quantum Grav. 18 3293-338 (Preprint hep-th/0005232) · DOI
  30. Ashtekar A and Lewandowski J 1998 Quantum theory of geometry: II. Volume operators Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1 388 (Preprint gr-qc/9711031) · arXiv
  31. Ashcroft N W and Mermin N 1976 Solid State Physics (London: Harcourt Brace) chapter 22

Authors
Sahlmann, H., & Thiemann, T.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (DE)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2006-01-19
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
909-954
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W1991845639
Cited by
114
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0090091)
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
quantum field theory in curved spacetime, background-independent quantum gravity, semiclassical states, quantum fluctuations of spacetime, random graphs, modified dispersion relations, scalar field, electromagnetic fields, matter-gravity coupling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review