Cited by 399Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Weaving a classical metric with quantum threads

Open access
Ashtekar, Abhay, Rovelli, Carlo, Smolin, Lee·1992·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Results that illuminate the physical interpretation of states of nonperturbative quantum gravity are obtained using the recently introduced loop variables. It is shown that (i) while local operators such as the metric at a point may not be well defined, there do exist nonlocal operators, such as the area of a given two-surface, which can be regulated diffeomorphism invariantly and which are finite without renormalization; (ii) there exist quantum states which approximate a given metric at large scales, but such states exhibit a discrete structure at the Planck scale.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.69.237

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because level spacing Δa_S goes to zero as a_S→∞, considerations of Bekenstein and Mukhanov [15] do not apply to large black holes in this approach and there is no reason to expect deviations from Hawking's semi-classical results.

    “Because the 'level spacing' ∆ a S goes to zero as a S goes to infinity, the considerations of [15] do not apply to large black holes in our approach and there is no reason to expect deviations from Hawking's semi-classical results.”

    From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [15]

    In the area-operator discussion (page unavailable), the paper says the corresponding area eigenvalues are integer multiples of a fixed Planck-area unit, contrary to the claim that their spacing tends to zero as area increases. Our copy does not discuss the proposed consequence for large black holes or Hawking’s results. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Local quantities tend to be divergent or ill-defined in non-trivial generally covariant quantum field theories.

    “Local quantities tend to be divergent or ill-defined in non-trivial generally covariant quantum field theories [3, 4, 11], a fact likely to be related to the non-renormalizability of the perturbative series.”

    From Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity (1995) · cites this paper as [4]

  • The volume operator construction corrects certain difficulties of a previous definition [4, 11].

    “This construction corrects certain difficulties of a previous definition [4, 11].”

    From Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity (1995) · cites this paper as [4]

    The passages on geometric operators (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) describe constructions of Q[ω] and an area operator, including difficulties with defining a local metric operator. Searches for a volume operator and a previous volume definition found no passage saying that a volume-operator construction corrects earlier difficulties. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The volume operator is finite and diffeomorphism invariant.

    “Furthermore, as a consequence, for reasons that have been discussed previously[3, 4, 11] the operator is finite and diffeomorphism invariant.”

    From Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity (1995) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Abstract says that non-local operators such as the area operator can be regulated diffeomorphism invariantly and are finite without renormalization. The discussion of operators (equations 4–9; page unavailable) treats Q[ω] and area, not volume. Searches for “volume” and “volume operator” found no passage establishing those properties for a volume operator. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Any spinfoam model admits a group field theory formulation, which is triangulation independent.

    “It was shown in [16] that any spinfoam model [17], as the one we define here, admits a group field theory (GFT) [18] formulation, which is triangulation independent.”

    From LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter (2008) · cites this paper as [16]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. B.S. DeWitt, E. Myers, R. Harrington and A. Kapulkin, Nucl. Phys.B. (Proc. Suppl.) 20, 744 (1991);
  2. A. Ashtekar, Non-perturbative canonical quantum gravity (Notes prepared in collaboration with R.Tate) (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
  3. C. Rovelli, Class. & Quant. Grav. 8, 1613 (1991).
  4. L. Smolin, Recent developments in nonperturbative quantum gravity Syracuse pre-print SU-GP-92/2-2, to appear in the Proceedings of the 1991 GIFT International Seminar on Theoretical Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, in press.), hepth preprint number 9202022.
  5. A. Ashtekar Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2244 (1986), Phys. Rev.D36, 1587 (1987).
  6. C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1155 (1988);
  7. See, for example, J. A. Wheeler, in "Battelle Rencontres 1967", eds. C. DeWitt, J. A. Wheeler, Ben- jamin 1968; B. Ferretti, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 40, 169 (1984).;
  8. M. Toller, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 29, 963 (1990);
  9. R. Penrose, in Quantum Theory and Beyond, ed. T. Bastin (Cambridge University Press,1971);
  10. J. Barbour and L. Smolin, Syracuse Preprint SU-GP-92/2-4 (1992).
  11. Note that such states are not normally considered in ordinary quantum field theories based on Fock inner products. However, in the absence of a background metric the Fock inner product cannot be defined. Instead, quantum field theories on manifolds without background metrics may be based on representations of the sort introduced by A. Ashtekar and C.J. Isham (Class. & Quan. Grav., in press) within which the characteristic states of loops are normalizable.
  12. J. Zegwaard, Utrecht preprint THU-91/13 (1991).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashtekar, A., Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1992-07-13
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
237-240
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1864482988
Cited by
399
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9016733, 9012099, 8815209)
  • Syracuse University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
loop quantum gravity, non-perturbative quantum gravity, classical limit, diffeomorphism invariance, nonlocal operators, area operator, Planck scale discreteness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review